Canelo vs Saunders likely for May

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BoxingDialogue, Jan 28, 2021.


  1. Grinder

    Grinder Dude, don't call me Dude Full Member

    6,113
    2,860
    Mar 24, 2005
    But when Canelo holds his high guard and takes a shuddering shot, that is a point to him for defensive mastery.
     
  2. African Cobra

    African Cobra The Right Honourable Lord President of the Council banned Full Member

    27,342
    10,131
    May 29, 2007
    With what?
     
  3. ShovelHook

    ShovelHook Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,480
    12,162
    Jul 22, 2019
    Because rehydration clauses are used to leave a fighter dehydrated which is dangerous? If he had a clause on the fight night weight then that's fair enough but deliberately making it so that someone is diminished in a way that's proven to increase the risk of long-term brain damage is just scumbaggery.
     
  4. Richmondpete

    Richmondpete Real fighters do road work Full Member

    7,140
    5,029
    Oct 22, 2015
    My question is, if your going to have a problem with weight cutting, but are opposed to the idea of limiting how much you can actually cut and still be cleared to fight it seems somewhat hypocritical since a rehydration limit seems like a reasonable middle ground . If a 168 pound fighter needs to come in at 180+ to be successful at that weight could it not be argued that he shouldn't be there in the first place if your going to make any argument at all? I know you will still have idiots cutting too much regardless but why are the rules made with those types of atheletes at the forefront of concern as opposed to having a reasonable middle ground in a hydration limit and let the idiots who ignore there own safety worry about themselves