Canelo vs Terrence was RIGGED/ FIXED FIGHT. Canelo ‘’threw the fight’’ by purposely missing punches

I'm sorry, rivalries are one thing, Oscar's reacting to Canelo losing was extremely cringe, it was an immature and frankly juvenile type reaction. DLH is 52 years old, long retired, is supposedly a promoter and is acting like a teenager. He should conduct himself in a more dignified manner and he should show more professionalism when discussing Canelo. And although there was some beef between him and Canelo, he shouldn't be such a hater. What annoys me is not only the wanting to see Canelo lose, but he's also showed a lot of negativity towards the event itself, and many events Canelo was involved with. It's unprecedented to see a former promoter become such a toxic detractor from a fighter's career, to the extent Oscar has with Canelo. It's pathetic really and you're trying to normalize it by saying I'm overreacting. No, sorry, Oscar De La Hoya has come off as a complete ass in recent years, his comments towards Canelo come off as bad. He already had a well known rivalry with Mayweather, but that's different. They met in the ring, they were actual rival fighters. Canelo isn't a rival fighter, he was a guy who DLH promoted and put him in some of Canelo's greatest nights. And to see him turn into this spiteful hater of Canelo is extremely cringe and annoying.

 

To his defense; Canelita seems to be a complete douchbag with an ego the size of Manhattan. A nightmare to promote.And i thought all Hoya's points were correct, but i agree he's totally unhinged: certainly drugs are involved.

 

That was not the version of Canelo from a few years back. He had slipped a fair bit as evidenced by his recent fights.

But he was beaten fair and square in that event.
I don't believe he threw the fight.

That was the best he could do on that evening against Bud.

And I picked Canelo to win.

 

With this and Pac-Barrios, it has provided us with a verifiable idiot test as to when people come out and claim the fights were fixed.

 

Numerous fights have been fixed, mostly in bygone days.

Canelo - Crawford was NOT one of them.

 

I'm not disagreeing with you in that boxing is laden with many fixed fights in its history. My comment was more directed to those who dislike the result of a prominent fight so they claim it was fixed.

 

He was slipping by the GGG rubber match

The Bivol matched proved it

The next 5 wins he had, against lower tier top 10 guys, couldn’t stop any of them

 

I think in this case there is no credible evidence of a fix.

I think it's more likely that Canelo has slipped a fair bit since GGG days.

And I think Terence might always have been a bit bigger than he let on.

On the night, Bud was undoubtedly better.

 

Join Date: September 2025
Age: 2 years old

Whose troll alt account is this...? You couldn't be anymore obvious.

 

If the AI judge has it 4-1 Canelo after 5, that ****ing Clanker needs to be shut down immediately for it's stupidity. Anyone who had Canelo ahead at that point is either an idiot who doesn't know how to score, is dishonest, or both.

 

Are you aware that many Humans on here who scored it in the RBR had Canelo ahead after 5? There should be more focus on the AI judge, given that they have been promoting AI judging as an extension of the scoring. In the past several posters on this very forum have cited AI punch stats, for example, to argue that GGG Beat Canelo the first two times.

The AI card not only had Canelo ahead 4-1 after 5, but they also had Canelo winning Rounds 10 and 11, meaning that, heading into the 12 rounds, Terance couldn't win without scoring a KD, only could win the 12th and get a Draw.

At the very least, I think we all deserve an explanation as to how the AI scored those rounds to Canelo. Like an official explanation as to what the AI saw that the Humans failed to see or vice versa. In a Fight of this magnitude, this discussion neds to be had. For the Ring to publicly promote a scorecard with a different result than the official result as part of the Fight Telecast, but to not address or discuss this controversy at all is at minimum suspicious.

To live in a society that claims to be all about relying on AI in the future for our information, to help us humans, and for the Official AI Judge of the Fight of the Century to have it a Draw and Canelo retaining his Undisputed Titles, completely contradicting the claim of human "Max Kellerman" that Bud won the Fight and there's no way you can have it any other way, this doesn't really add up.

I personally have no problem with Bud winning but there's a difference between accepting the result and you who are claiming that it's unreasonable to have Canelo winning 4-1 after 5 or having the fight a draw. If you read through the RBR, there were a ton of posters who had Canelo winning, and the rest (mostly) had it Extremely Close or a Draw.

But what you are doing here is no better or worse than saying Mayweather and Bivol won every round against Canelo. I'm tired of reading these kinds of lies, exaggerations and misrepresentations on a regular basis. I have no problem with Bud winning, but lets not get crazy. The fact of the matter is that the Compubox #s and the AI judge tell a completely different picture than the one your painting and in the past they have been used to support such reasoning.