Most people in the real world had Canelo beating Golovkin in the rematch. Therefore, you do not live in the real world. Most boxing legends, trainers, and boxers who were asked about the rematch had Canelo beating Golovkin in the rematch. The real world.
The majority of fans have moved on from the controversy of the first fight and now have Canelo as the PFP#1 fighter of the world and the "FACE OF BOXING". Try to keep up.
85 % of ring siders for fight 2 voted a GGG win Canelo has never legitimately beaten GGG or even fought a draw with him. Vegas scorecards dont count
Honestly, JOKER is hurting inside. All that nonsense about Canelo giving Smith and Bivol short training camps, makes him look like a whiney little baby since Pac Lost on 11 days notice, and now hes full of excuses.
Fielding socks, Smith is not a good boxer and could only be a title holder in weak era. Kovalev was the only well schooled fighter of that size Canelo has faced and he was a shell of his former self. So using those as evidence that Canelo does well against larger opponents is flawed logic. With that being said Plant isn't much better than Smith so I dont see Canelo losing this one either.
I dont get the Canelo slander. He had some help from some generous judges, but the dude can outbox boxers and outbrawl brawlers. Apart from Mayweather, no one has really outclassed him. The majority of fans, boxers, and analysts will say that he won the GGG 2, and it makes sense, GGG was on his back foot practically the whole night, thats something no one saw coming. Its a bit more mixed when it comes to GGG 1 with a lot saying he lost, and a few saying he won. The question with Canelo is do you take workrate and jabbing while on the back foot or do you take the stalker who lands about half of his haymakers. Watch his fights and thats usually the story. The workrate looks nice, but landing 10 and 15 jabs per round while on the bike can't really outweigh those body shots that makes it look like hes cutting a tree down. Canelo usually takes the mid rounds off, so it makes sense that his opponents can win a few rounds there. His opponents are really in a lot of trouble when they fight canelo because if they fight on the outside they are gonna have some badly bruised torsos, but if they fight on the inside they might get knocked out. GGG was one of the few with the power to hurt canelo, and he ate those shots like a bag of chips (except the one in the 10th round). There isnt a fighter rn who can really put in a boxing clinic to outscore Canelo, and his iron chin ensures that no one can knock him out either (well maybe Benavides).
You should prob rewatch the fight so you can see who was in control. Also, lara landed plenty of hard shots marked canelos face to and look at body language and canelos face at the end of 12. He knows he lost. The way you talk you musta thought all whitaker and clay did was run. Canelo ran vs ggg in the first fight. Didnt land anything period. Howd you have that scored? If you cant admit that was a clear loss the there is no need for us to discuss anything about canelo. You prob also had it a draw or canelo beating floyd.
Anybody saying he won or a draw in ggg1 is a straight bias homer. Guy gassed, didnt land anything and ran.