Cant believe what I am reading

HAHAHHAHA Good one man.

But on a serious note.....Froch got schooled

 

He did that but only in few rounds, yet people seem to think he did that for 12 rounds. He made Froch miss badly many times but not all the time, yet people think Froch never connected on him.

 

He landed very occasionally and won a few rounds (maybe 3), Froch was certainly stronger and the harder hitter but he got schooled, got outlanded by 3-1, it wasnt close, the decision was an outrage

 

:rofl:rofl When *****? When? Name the moment. Name the ****ing round. When he landed that ONE left hook when Dirrell was backing up.. He hurt him? Did you see the replay *****? Did you see Dirrell roll the punch not even taking full impact and not even slightly hurt or wobbled. Meanwhile Froch got knocked across the ring with a counter left hook. He bloodied his nose..lol that happened in the early 3 rounds when nobody was landing hard shots.. Got to love this eurobull****.

 

ur mos def in the minority...dirrell easily won that fight..actually wasn't hard to see..

 

"AMERICA, kicking terrorist a$$, and helping to defend that pu$$y of a country YOU call home."

 

Dirrell hit Froch much more and hit Froch harder. How Froch could have gotten that decision is beyond me. Maybe his head hurt Dirrell's hands?

 

I had Dirrell by 2...Froch maybe got a draw at best.

Either way Froch was ****...and Dirrell ran like a *****

Neither of them should keep the title!

 

**** no McDonalds 24/7!

 

Froch looked like an amateur plain and simple.

 

I wanted a draw. I don't have anything wrong with the decision, though.

 

well dirrell did not complain so what does this tell you..it was a close fight..froch won..dirrell could have.

 

This is all just a patriotism thing. Sad really. The truth is that the fight was close - judges penalised Dirrell for negativity. It's not rocket science.

 

me too neither fighter deserved to win that fight.