Carl Frampton or Barry Mcguigan - who is the Greater fighter?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Conway, Apr 17, 2019.



Carl Frampton or Barry Mcguigan - who is the Greater fighter?

  1. Frampton

    45.7%
  2. Mcguigan

    54.3%
  1. Journey Man

    Journey Man Journeyman always. Full Member

    4,951
    2,121
    Aug 22, 2009
    Disagree mate. Pedroza and LaPorte were solid wins agreeably, but Taylor never really achieved anything in his career and was never considered a top contender.

    I think Frampton's resume of Molitor (faded), Quigg, Santa Cruz, Donaire (starting to fade - but has gone on and beat Burnett) slightly tops that. And the fact that it was over two weights.
     
    Brixton Bomber and Birmingham like this.
  2. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,216
    5,004
    Dec 27, 2010

    Injury beat Burnett. Not donaire. Frampton achieved little to nothing at 126. The two weight argument doesn't hold up.
     
  3. dryzer

    dryzer Active Member Full Member

    749
    642
    Sep 12, 2017
    you've seriously high standards if winning a world title is nothing
     
    Brixton Bomber likes this.
  4. Momus

    Momus Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,732
    2,555
    Nov 27, 2010
    I'm not sure how you can describe a convincing win over a top 10 ATG (and possibly top 5) featherweight as merely "solid", while simultaneously bigging up wins over Molitor and Quigg.

    LaPorte was a beast, and would have a much flashier record if he hadn't been going toe to toe with ATGs - Sanchez, Pedroza, Gomez, Chavez to name a few.

    Taylor was a huge talent, one of the quickest fighters of the modern era, and came very close to dethroning Pedroza before McGuigan did. Without the US boycott, he may well have had the additional kudos of an Olympic gold. He was ultimately an underachiever, but the fact that McGuigan took his '0' by stoppage is very impressive. He was heavily hyped and highly thought of in the early 80s.

    McGuigan fought (and was successful) in a much tougher era. There is no way the likes of Kiko Martinez would be a factor in the mid 80s featherweight division.
     
  5. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,216
    5,004
    Dec 27, 2010
    He’s always seemed perfectly fair and pleasant to me.
     
  6. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,216
    5,004
    Dec 27, 2010

    List Carl’s biggest wins at feathweigh. Then compare them to mcguigans.
     
  7. dryzer

    dryzer Active Member Full Member

    749
    642
    Sep 12, 2017
    Still doesn't mean he achieved nothing at 126
     
  8. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,216
    5,004
    Dec 27, 2010
     
  9. Jurgen

    Jurgen Pay Per Pudding Advisor banned Full Member

    13,416
    19,415
    Sep 30, 2016
    Due to the plethora of world titles, it means much less these days compared to when McGuigan fought.

    Plenty of example of recent very poor World Champions these days - Charles Martin, Pudding Stiverne, Skippy Burns (Post Beltran), Bepe Di marco, Anthony Crolla, Tony Bellew, Rocky Fielding, Joey Parker, Charlie Edwards, Manuel Charr, Tyrone Zuege, Terry Flanagan, James Degale, Arfur Abrahum., Kell Brook, David Haye (Heavyweight), Jamie McDonnell.

    The list of pony 'World Champions' is endless and totally devalues the significance of single belt World Championship wins.
     
  10. Momus

    Momus Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,732
    2,555
    Nov 27, 2010
    By comparison, the champions when McGuigan was an active featherweight were:

    Eusebio Pedroza
    Salvador Sanchez
    Juan LaPorte
    Wilfredo Gomez
    Azumah Nelson

    (the IBF 126 title was barely recognised at that point)

    Look at that list compared to the titlists at 122-126 during Frampton's era. The fact that McGuigan was able to beat two of the guys above, and win and defend a major title, shows that he was a quality fighter. His star burned out quickly, but he reached heights that Frampton never did.
     
  11. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,216
    5,004
    Dec 27, 2010
    Good posts in this thread. :)
     
  12. Holler

    Holler Doesn't appear to be a paid matchroom PR shill Full Member

    12,502
    23,631
    Mar 12, 2018
    Indeed.

    He was also badly mismanaged. The background to the Vegas fight was appalling. If he'd not gone through that he may have had years more as a top fighter.
     
    Momus and lencoreastside like this.
  13. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,216
    5,004
    Dec 27, 2010
    I don't get the nasty attitude towards Barry by some posters. He seems to get a lot of vitriol for no good reason. I followed Barry from his amateur days and as a fan, (admittedly not knowing the guy personally )i always found him to come across as a very decent guy. Likeable friendly fair and sporting.....so what's not to like?

    I'm a big Carl fan but I have to say Carl has never made the slightest effort with his southern Irish fans. Whereas Barry put time into ALL his fans.
     
    Brixton Bomber likes this.
  14. Cecil

    Cecil Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,997
    4,983
    Mar 22, 2015
    Both in achievement and head to head Barry is superior.
    I like Frampton a good skilled operator but he’s a level down of what McGuigan was.
     
    lencoreastside likes this.
  15. Birmingham

    Birmingham Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,076
    6,776
    Jan 13, 2017
    Len, no disrespect intended, you must be the last man that cant see McGuigan for what he is, a horrible little spiteful man. Forget the fighter, look at the man. You have plenty to see with it, I honestly think your not good at reading people, I mean we had the bags off about Kellie Maloney ffs, again a non argument, plenty of info on him/her being horrible, actually on film