Carl Froch Calling Out Calzaghe For A Street Fight

You are right we will have to disagree as I would have favoured Woodhall over Taylor, Abraham, Dirrell and think he would have fought a tough close fight with Froch, due to Frochs struggle with movers

 

Yeah, so great that it got him booted off Skysports because no one wanted to watch that garbage.

 

Your saying wood hall would have beaten jermain Taylor. I'm sorry I can take this seriously

 

i didn't mention rematches, but how froch performs following a defeat. i also stated i have no issue with joe chasing bigger fights, i don't know what's so hard to grasp about that.

as for fights some people felt he lost, or froch not being mandatory because joe won the belt off kessler, you're just clutching at straws.

 

Yes at SMW I would favour Woodhall who had proven form at the weight over Taylor who other than 2 debateable wins over Hopkins didnt look overly impressive at MW and then didnt appear to be a top SMW losing more than winning when finally stepping up in weight before dropping back to MW

 

This is what happens when a poster cant debate a subject and gets backed into a corner.
Now you class yourself a greater numpty than a "c" fan boy atsch

 

connor

i aint debating with you as i stated you twist fighters who lost to fighter a , b c and this person beat that person

copy paste boxerec files etc etc your boring as fook

you say taylor struggled with bhop at least he struggled with a closer to prime bhop than the one your dad got a razor close decision over an even older bhop than ran to the welsh hillside


and as you doing his dirty work on twa tter

numbty > cun tish fanboy except it and move on

 

Nothing is hard for me to grasp.
How am I clutching at straws?
I never said Froch wasnt mandatory for the WBC title, I said Kessler was the champ and he chose to fight Calzaghe.
Whats hard about that for you to grasp?
You just said you have no problem with bigger fights being chased but then say Im clutching at straws when I said after beating Kessler, Calzaghe chose not to defend the WBC SMW title against Froch, but to chase a bigger fight and you call that (which you dont have a problem with) clutching at straws?
I agree Froch has come back well from defeats, but one fight after a loss to Kessler he was in a tough fight with G Johnson, so Im not sure quite what you are trying to get at really but happy to go with that

 

which as left your dad jealous and bitter

money carl as more legacy well carls legacys ranks higher


your dads choice


good day :hi:

 

tough fight against a tough opponent. which froch won.

froch didn't stop being mandatory for the wbc because joe won it. the way you try to twist my words is all the evidence needed regards your straw-clutching proclivities!

 

So you are a bit sore
I wouldnt get involved with Twitter and dont like the sound of any of what I have heard about
You fail to note that Calzaghe beat Hopkins when Hopkins wasnt having as tough a time with the weight and arguably sandwiched between Hopkins best wins :hi:

 

Dont know how you think Calzaghe can be my dad