Carl Froch has lost 3 of his last 6 fights he is no GREAT

Dirrell did not dominate Froch.

If you want to argue that he ought to have been awarded more rounds on the 10PM system, fine.

There was no domination involved.

 

he is getting extremely overrated

 

look at who he is fighting dog, the very elite prime fighters at smw. the slick fighters, orthodox, southpaws etc. etc.he was not going to win against kessler in his hometown. so unless he stopped kessler or droped him over and over he was not going to win, so he gets a pass on that fight.i thought he loss to dirrell but beat kessler but what ever. he should only have 2 losses and some feel 1 and i could see that as well.i never thought of froch as underated because i thought he was a beast and if you did not think so then shows what you know.hes the number 2 sm in the world and should be top 10 p4p i dont know what his rank is.

 

Just watched the fight with Kessler again. Even the biased commentators thought Kessler 'just nicked it'. Those guys were funny. They won't give an actual score card and there score seems to float in order to keep Froch close.

Kessler did a lot of body work and that took a toll on Froch by the end of the fight.

 

shut up you ****ing moron.

dirrell's name has popped up a lot over the last 24 HRs.... why?

carl beat him and he's done nothing since. and ward didn't want to fight bute. he hoped another fighter (froch) would do the dirty so he wouldn't have to.

great win for froch last night. lets forget about the two andre's. they're as pathetic as each other. boring, ugly, and cowardly. oh, and cheating till their hearts consent. i want to watch REAL fighters, not two circus freaks.

 

:rofl clown.

 

froch lost fair and squire to kessler. froch wasn't ill when he fought the billy goat AKA the" serial grabber", either.

 

It seems as though there is always revisionist scoring on here. Dirrell dominated Froch, Hopkins dominated Calzaghe, Mayweather had multiple 10-8 rounds versus Hatton, etc. etc. It could be noobs just looking up boxrec, not actually scoring (or watching) the fights and then spouting nonsense. Who knows? :conf

 

Agreed (about the Dirrell beating Froch part) and Froch went over to Denmark and beat Kessler with the same outcome hi:

 

it was a close fight between dirrell and froch, but froch won. he came to fight and win. dirrell didn't. end of story.

 

Honestly, I'd like to know how you scored the rounds on Kessler/Froch. If you watch nothing else of the fight watch the two corners afterwards. Jubilation in Kessler's corner and dejection in Froch's. I'm talking when he first walks back. They all knew. Even Duke "floating scorecard" McKenzie had it for Kessler.

 

Hopkins :rofl