Carl Froch has lost 3 of his last 6 fights he is no GREAT

i believe he put himself in with the bute win. still more to come as well.

 

Uh is this a serious question? It was a Super Six fight man, he had to fight Dirrell...:think Not sure if serious

 

:huh he didn't lose.

 

he's talking about a rematch. and i agree. dirrell has done nothing to earn it.

 

We are talking about Dirrell getting a fight with Froch now.

 

Shouldn't we be talking about Dirrell taking an actual fight first??? I mean he has done absolutly nothing to deserve a shot at Froch atm ... Froch has better opponents in his sight - and much better paying ones too.

A rematch can happen when Dirrell has done something to make the fight worth while for Froch ... atm he is just a risk/reward nightmare ... If Froch loses he'll be back to square one - if he wins Dirrell will be proven a fighter with a lot of talent but no heart - a hype job.

 

And Johnson, Dirrell and Bute.

I assume you consider JMM a HOF'er, but he doesn't have one win on his record were he was expected to lose as the underdog but overcame and won anyway. Seriously every big name win he has on his record is a fight he was favored to win in. Except for maybe Barerra.

 

Oh I apologize my bad.

 

Who cares if he's great or not...

Always a pleasure to watch.

 

Racist ****.

 

Yes he did, even if Dirrell did enough to win, Froch was awarded the fight. Just like he beat Kessler got lost the decision. And Johnson might be older, but you know as well as I do he has been a force throughout his late 30's thru 40's. Also you might think Bute is **** now, but before they fought he was the big favorite. Most people had him at #2 in the division (some even crazily at #1.) Whether or not he was exposed means little he was rated very high and favored to win before fight time.