Carl Froch is one of the best boxers in in many years

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Danish Dawg, Jul 26, 2013.


  1. persianprince

    persianprince Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,890
    120
    Mar 29, 2011
    Dirrell might have alot of talent, but he has no chin and heart. Froch has become a lot better since their first fight, where as Dirrell is nowhere to be seen. I'd fancy the Cobra to stop Dirrell no.
     
  2. stocks

    stocks Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,558
    0
    Aug 19, 2010
    agree
     
  3. Boxmaster

    Boxmaster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,231
    11
    Aug 15, 2009

    Andre Dirrell? Are you ****ing serious?! Robin Reid? Are you serious? George Grove and Sven Ottke? Frankie Liles?

    Winky Wright was that good but not so good at that weight.
     
  4. Boxer-MMASux

    Boxer-MMASux Active Member Full Member

    712
    1
    Jul 21, 2013
    Sorry, but with the exception of Taylor, none of these opponents are "Great" boxers. In fact, MaGee, Abraham, Bute, and Pascal are only decent boxers and really not as good as you are presenting.
    Taylor outboxed Froch for 12 rounds before he ran of out stamina and got hit with a good punch.
    Froch is not as much of a boxer as a brawler. Whenever he faces a real boxer (Taylor, Dirrell, Ward) he loses.
     
  5. Danish Dawg

    Danish Dawg Guest

    How is Kessler not great when Taylor is? How is Pascal and Bute not good boxers? Seriously, you're being a noob right now. And Froch stopped Taylor by TKO, so don't say Froch loses against guys like him, lol.

    He did lose to Dirrell and Ward, though. His first match against Kessler in Denmark should have been a draw, IMO.
     
  6. Talivar

    Talivar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    52
    Jan 22, 2008
    Why do ppl keep saying Taylor outboxed Froch for 12 rounds then got hit by a good punch?. IMO it clearly shows they did not even watch the fight or have forgotten it lol
     
  7. Danish Dawg

    Danish Dawg Guest

    Agree. People are just stupid and their arguments are really pathetic.
     
  8. Talivar

    Talivar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    52
    Jan 22, 2008
    If Taylor had hung on and survived the scores would have been 114-112, 114-112 for taylor and 116-110 for Froch, hardly Taylor outboxing Froch for 12 rounds
     
  9. Danish Dawg

    Danish Dawg Guest

    Well... My honest opinion is that Taylor was clearly winning, but Froch had his moments and by the end of the day, Froch was the victor, and it was well-deserved, he was brutal during the finish. So I don't get why people keep talking sh!t about Froch.
     
  10. Talivar

    Talivar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    52
    Jan 22, 2008
    It was a fight of two halfs for me, JT took Roughly the first 7 and got a KD and Froch took the final 5 and got a KD
     
  11. Danish Dawg

    Danish Dawg Guest

    You could certainly have a point there, it's a good time since I saw the fight now and I remember Froch having some of the later rounds.
     
  12. Talivar

    Talivar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    52
    Jan 22, 2008
    No doubt JT would have won if he had hung on tho, but it was closer than many remember :) I think the Froch - Groves fight will be closer than some imagine aswell but Froch will do similiar to what he did to Taylor
     
  13. Danish Dawg

    Danish Dawg Guest

    I don't see Groves winning, but if he does, he deserves the credit it's gonna bring him. Carl is a good win, even at his current age, he has proven that.
     
  14. DBLOCK

    DBLOCK Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,536
    1
    Jul 27, 2011
    froch was minutes away from his first loss before he caught up to a damaged jermain taylor.
     
  15. Talivar

    Talivar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    52
    Jan 22, 2008
    Or you could say Froch showed an elite mentality by being able to pull a win out of the bag when it seemed all but over?, all about perspectives and/or Bias on here :(