Carl Froch is the truth.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by TheCobra, Jun 16, 2008.


Page 5 of 5
  1. Steve Fox

    Steve Fox Guest

    Froch does not rely heavily on reflexes - he does however, rely on accuracy and timing - watch the fights again now that I've enlightened you.

    Would you not have considered Inkin a step up? And do you think that fight never took place because of Froch? Or are you refering to the offer made by Bute's people? The offer only you seem to know about.

    As for calling me a 'nuthugger' - how many posters of Bute have you got pinned to your wall, you simple ****ing clown!
     
    Steve Fox, Jun 18, 2008
    Steve Fox, Jun 18, 2008
    #61
  2. Bomber

    Bomber Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,526
    0
    Jan 9, 2008
    I heard Tommy Hearns looked enviously into Carl's eyes when he saw him. Tommy then sat down in a dark room and weeped gently.
     
    Bomber, Jun 18, 2008
    Bomber, Jun 18, 2008
    #62
  3. Steve Fox

    Steve Fox Guest

    Froch did actually say in the post fight interview, that he knew Robin was past his best and that in he was under no illusions about that.
     
    Steve Fox, Jun 18, 2008
    Steve Fox, Jun 18, 2008
    #63
  4. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    You never provided me with these, though:

    This content is protected


    Inkin falls in the same category as Froch. A prospect who did his best not to step up when he had the chance. At least he doesn't make a fool of himself with outlandish claims about how good he is.

    None. I am not a nuthugger, like you.

    I don't think Bute is the truth. I think he is very good and a Top 3 fighter at SMW, nothing more. I don't think he'll be the best SMW in the world, ever. Best case scenario, he performs at B+ level, constantly. If he does do better than that, I will say he does when he's proven it.


    ...see the difference between me and you?
     
    Decebal, Jun 18, 2008
    Decebal, Jun 18, 2008
    #64
  5. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    It cannot be argued that Froch is not deluded but neither can it be argued that Froch is the truth given that he's been a pro for over six years, had a long and varied amateur experience and is 31 already, with nothing to show for it. If you're the truth, you win a title by the age of 26 or so. If you are the truth, your fans don't have to start threads saying you are the truth when you're still a 31 year-old prospect who has ducked big challenges as best he could for a long time. If you are the truth, it's obvious you are the truth. :good
     
    Decebal, Jun 18, 2008
    Decebal, Jun 18, 2008
    #65
  6. Steve Fox

    Steve Fox Guest

    The most obvious difference between me and you is, you're obviously a nerd (go on, tell me you're not). Another apparent difference, is the fact I don't tend to use completely unquantifiable terms like 'The Truth' and 'B+' as if they have a definitive meaning.
     
    Steve Fox, Jun 18, 2008
    Steve Fox, Jun 18, 2008
    #66
Page 5 of 5