Carl Froch - Man or Mouse?

You twist posts and change the context of something to try and be right about well, just something and you accuse people without base and cant back it up....you brought up Ward v Groves, not me, its obvious if those 2 fight next Froch cant fight either you absolute fool, like that needs pointing out-also i very much doubt either would pick that fight over the chance to rematch Froch (Given both their comments on a Froch fight)

You are clearly a child, no more discussion needed.
Sunshine-my g0d, who do you think you are hahahaha

Dont reply as it will be completely irrelevant to any point ive made

 

so where did i say kessler 3 you just blantantly make shi t up :verysad my littlte spunk bubble if your trying to troll get it fu cking right little lion man
was it cramped in that test tube ****o:hi:
your not on ignore but i aint wasting my time especially some one with the name lion
just keep making shi t up to suit your agenda,
how many people you called mate today rallying round i see ****

 

you post where i said kessler 3 **** untill then your a **** , when you cant find it you can admit your a first class wank stain :deal
and i swear you would suck the sweat out of geroges **** stained boxers not to worry there a few like that round theses parts , you wrongun

 

I bet on Groves and was gutted when he lost because of inept refereeing. However, Froch is one of the few British fighters who have stepped up and taken on the best available, so his manhood isn't in doubt.

I have more time for him and Hatton or Benn than the likes of Calzaghe who fight shells of fighters and then call themselves "legend killers", that's for sure.

 

It is not a bit cowardly to complain about an unlucky loss, and resort to name calling when things do not go your way?

I hope and suspect Groves is better than that, and if the rematch does not happen, George carries on improving. Then hopefully in due course, you are calling Ward or his successor 'a coward' in an attempt for Groves to show himself the finest in the division in a fight with the champ.

 

I don't blame him for running from Groves. He got knocked unconscious and got dumped on the canvas like a staggering drunk. He somehow recovered between the rounds only to take a brutal beating the likes of which he has never received. I would be scared of fighting Groves again too if he did that to me first time out. Rather not hey haha.

 

You do know this is boxing? Far better fighters than Groves have been screwed far worse than George. These so called 'controversies' happen. Groves camp made the most of it, and got a lot of publicity.

But it has died down now, people seem just as happy to see Froch fight rematches with Kessler or Ward, maybe even a fight with a Chavez.

George is not completely out the picture, and may still get a rematch. But if he does not he needs to worry about George Groves not Carl Froch, or else he could go down the same path of the likes of David Tiberi or Meldrick Taylor, where one controversy ruined their career (or lack of).

 

Really???

Have to disagree there.

 

I think most of the fancy believe Froch has had a very solid career that maybe is coming to an end. And few are going to begrudge him that one final big pay day, maybe in the States. We may often be cynical in boxing, but we are also a little sentimental over the better fighters.

 

Froch is wrong to say that, as I've said in the past he is a w**ker outside the ring. But IMO so is Groves.

I don't believe he is a coward as he has fought the best in the divison. Fine you disagree but we are allowed to think differently...