no excuse for a rematch , read my previous post as you like to point out to other people ****yo :hey now calm down dearest dont let the fact tko9 upset you so much just get some counciling and in time you will beable to move on , as for kenny not having adequate time for preperation some could say put him at a slight disadvantage , some not all :tired
You Froch fan boy chicken hawk. I can just read into your posts and draw my own conclusions into your mentality YOUR A SHITE BAG :deal
and your the one mentioning mentality oh the joys so your homophobic is there a reason for this daddy love you to much :think , great this psycolgy shite
So i was right then :yep Your full of excuses why Froch shouldn't give Groves the rematch. First it was that it should be Froch's last fight, Calzaghe didn't rematch Reid, the Barrera-Khan incident and now Groves never beat Anderson or gave him therematch. I mean listen to yourself You are just as deluded as Froch. I mean what sort of man are you that you don't think Groves should get the rematch.. If Froch is the champion he say's he is then he has a responsibility as a champion to give Groves the rematch.
and ask your self why i am able to ask these questions , i could not really give a fu ck if there is a rematch or not , who should of who could of but i ask you this , for one out cry you have to make another where a point of injustice is felt and it goes on and on and on as stated before either get some counciling or let it go , what will be will be your threads or post aint changing **** :deal
Oh yeah you don't give f*ck, You lying b*stard. Your that concerned about it that you keep posting back with every excuse in the book to as to how Froch should avoid a rematch. Yeah i can tell your a typo yellow Froch fan running from the question. But what sort of champion is talking about vacating his title if he is forced to fight Groves again? By the way my posts might not mean **** to you, but they will mean everything to Froch. Look back at people have agreed with me even fighters themselves :good
i really dont give a fu ck i like both fighters and said whatever happens nxt aint going to eat at me like it is you , as stated you think your thread in the grand scheme of things is going to do what :think , now i will let you get on protesting the injustice of syria , the burns beltran situation then you can help protesting in burma then you can try and sort out mendez v barthemely from the other night , then you can get on to f w a n k on how he f u c k ed the warrior that is barrera and what happened with the head butt and some how let it get to a round 5 card desicion you see it goes on and on counciling is what you needed , all that hate aint good for no one all of the above will keep you busy for the time being enjoy your crusade :-(( now good day to you axe wound
That's fair enough, but it's not entirely true. Froch said he wanted the fight with th most cash, but when he was told it would be the Groves rematch he changed his tune and said he wasn't in it for the money.
You obviously do give a **** you whinging b*astard. Look at your excuses its pathetic you call yourself a man.:-( And what's syria or Burma got to do with it it this is a boxing forum you dim wit so keep it it about boxing. You obviously have an agenda about the rematch, but i would have more respect for you if you said you don't want Froch to take the fight because he will get beat because this is wat it's all about as you love Froch. I knew you were a bender :gayfight and i know its in your genetic make up to be a scared coward, but as i said before you might not give a **** but Froch will. As for all these excuse why Froch shouldn't Rematch Groves the Khan-Barrera incident, Anderson and David Hayes toe (yeah you said it) its pathetic and it doesn't excuse Froch from being a coward. Two choices fight Groves or F*ck off.