Carl Froch now the 7th best Super middleweight in the world?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MichiganWarrior, Nov 7, 2010.


  1. Hiro

    Hiro Active Member Full Member

    1,326
    0
    Dec 13, 2008
    i forgot if i allrdy comment this.. but helll i must do it again..

    omg man.. find another hobby.. Glen over kessler and froch?! And Dirrel number 2 ?!

    Bute nr 3 ?!!?! Resume? give me 1 thing that earns bute nr 3 please.

    AA above Kessler and froch? wtf why?

    AA beat taylor, so did froch. AA lost against Dirrell, Froch won against Dirrell.

    Kessler won against Froch.

    Standings should be:

    1) Ward
    2) Kessler
    3) Froch
    4) Dirrell
    5) AA
    6) Bute
    7) Glen J
     
  2. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Eww. What a *****. Why would you write all that frail brit?
     
  3. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    :rofl He got a gift against a young fighter with only 17 fights never going 12 rounds before. A GIFT yous stupid muther****er. You know what that is? It means he didnt really win.

    He beat a shot middleweight. And a weight drained light heavyweight. Which is his only real credible victory.

    Then lost to a guy who couldnt see. Awesome. number 2 in the division. :lol:


    You Froch ***s are too much. trying so hard to rank a bad British fighter high.
     
  4. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010

    My list is not based on beating a bunch of Eurobums. Its based on talent. I dont rate Kessler because he beat more C level fighters then Bute or Dirrell. Both Dirrell and Bute are more talented. Froch is down at the bottom of my list because everyone in the top 6 beats his ass.

    What dont you understand about this?
     
  5. health70

    health70 Member Full Member

    280
    0
    Oct 27, 2010
    Your anti-British nonsense truly is boring.

    You are definitely correct though. Kessler has fought no-one, neither has Froch. On the other hand, winning against big names like William Johnson and Shannon Miller justifies Dirrell at 2. :rofl
     
  6. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    Are you saying "frail Brit" because of that other thread where you indicated British people are weak, because we know our doctors names? Something which requires minimal intelligence yet you struggled with.

    Interesting.

    In 2010, who produces more warrior fighters? Britain or Michigan? And you want to talk about "frail" when your only two noteworthy boxers are both ducking fights because they're scared of losing?

    Where did you live in Europe?
     
  7. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    Yes, more evidence of why you're the laughing stock of the forum.
     
  8. BunnyGibbons

    BunnyGibbons Is Not About That Life Full Member

    6
    6
    Jun 9, 2010
    Well, #2 at the moment
     
  9. health70

    health70 Member Full Member

    280
    0
    Oct 27, 2010
    I think you are overlooking Cornelius Bundrage.
     
  10. LancsTerrible

    LancsTerrible Different Forms of Game. Full Member

    8,657
    14
    Aug 1, 2010
    Once you realise that a non-American can be a good fighter maybe then you should come back to this debate?
     
  11. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    Well, there's also spud1, but he's not a bad kid, just a bit of an idiot.

    We really need some pound 4 pound rankings
     
  12. BunnyGibbons

    BunnyGibbons Is Not About That Life Full Member

    6
    6
    Jun 9, 2010
    :lol: Great idea. Stick it in the lounge, that should kill the rest of your workday
     
  13. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    It's done
     
  14. Hiro

    Hiro Active Member Full Member

    1,326
    0
    Dec 13, 2008

    Talent huh?... well..

    Maybe they should put my friends little brother in the list.. He is very talented!

    just kidding.. well.. talent or not-- let me say this.. Kessler is 1 year older than Bute.

    If Bute had talent, then it would have been Bute vs Calzaghe and not Kessler vs Calzaghe.

    I agree with Dirrell having talent. But then again he lacks the balls.. Dirrell will end up being a fighter who only fought bums in his prime.
     
  15. laffie

    laffie Montreal Full Member

    12,846
    1
    Jan 5, 2008
    The matchmaking does not goes on talent only, of course.