Carl Froch now the 7th best Super middleweight in the world?

abrahams only win at super middle is against taylor.
Direll lost to froch and beat abraham (whos only had one fight at super middle)

rankings should be

bute - most proven fighter
ward - only had one good win so far. But clearly best of the s6
kessler - beat froch
froch
direll
abraham
johnson
green

but then again im not surprised at your idiotic rankings considering who you are....surprised you dont have bika and sheika and manfredo ahed of froch

 

The top two in your list are a joke.

All this head injury bull**** from Dirrel. Ward was happy he isn't fighting Dirrel, and will now stick to fighting lesser opposition in his hometown.

 

Johnson all the way up at 5 come on now

He beat Green who cares

1 and 2 are Ward or Bute depending on who ya like
3 Kessler just beat undefeated Froch who beat Dirrel
4 Dirrel just beat undefeated Abraham
5 Froch lost close to Kessler beat Dirrel who beat Abraham
6 Abraham beat Taylor

 

He wont lose any fights by KO Im not saying he will win them all.The Abraham fight is a very hard one but Froch wont be knocked out.

 

Why the **** have you got Bute as no.1? He hasn't fought anyone to be the "most proven fighter" if anything he's the most unproven fighter

 

Green doesn't belong in the top 10! Bika,Andrade would walk over him!

 

The judges weren't from Nottingham mate

 

Froch is the one with the most solid legacy, should they all retire today. Kessler is up there too with Ward, Bute for his three years as a champion has done nothing, YET.

 

Agreed. Out of all these fighters, Froch has fought he best opposition, and will continue to do so, and has an excellent record against them. it's so annoying when people look back in hindsight and diminish a win.

I've been on ESB for years and have followed Froch's career outside of ESB and on here and it's always the same story. Even going as far back as the Magee fight. I saw people pick him to lose that and when he didn't, they made excuses. Before the Pascal fight, Froch wasn't favoured and most people thought Pascal, despite being the foreign opponent, would win the bout. When he went to America to fight Taylor, the majority of people thought he'd lose that bout because of how good Taylor looked against Lacy and that Froch was still an unknown quantity. After he won, Taylor became shot but nobody was saying that before the fight and he didn't look like a poor fighter in the ring. Dirrell was supposed to win, because he has massive styles advantages, yet didn't. Even though he lost against Kessler, he did better than many people expected him too. Many were saying he'd get knocked out or easily outboxed. When that didn't happen, the automatic response is that Kessler must have had a problem.

To diminish a guys career in hindsight, shows how limited your boxing knowledge is. This will happen throughout Froch's career because many people don't understand what makes him so good, so they pick against him time and time again. When he proves them wrong, rather than gives him deserved praise, they try and save face, which is why so many people rank him low or diminish his victories.

He's not technically great but he does have the best record of any 168lber and he will continue to prove people wrong.

 

:rofl

You are such a *****.

That classless piece of ghetto scum isn't rematching anyone because he's had to feign a brain injury in order to duck out of the super six with a little bit of a career intact. Everyone knows it, and deep down you know it too.

Dirrell stays in the competition, he loses to Ward and then he's 1-2 in his fights against decent opposition, his only win coming the way of a DQ he got by pretending to be injured. He has no career.

You watch him make a miraculous recovery once the tournament is all wrapped up.

 

MichiganWarrior is wright and everyone else with a different opinion is wrong!

 

You just repeated everything I said you would. Seriously, are you that much of an idiot?