Carl Froch Says He'd Fight Mikkel Kessler Next If He Could

It would be a good fight i think Kessler would win on points.I hope it happens

 

Kessler will win this one for sure...

1) Kessler is way better counter hitter than taylor, and kessler will catch froch much more and much harder than he caught calzaghe, whom is a way better boxer than froch.

2) Froch has no defence at all, and no movement, so kesslers suberb jabs will kill froch.

3) Taylor lost to froch cuz of his bad stamina! And remember kessler is better than taylor. If taylor could stay up, the macht would proberly be a draw or taylor...NOw kessler is better than taylor + has better stamina, how do we know that?
1. Bute vz andrade = Bute was gone in the last round and andrade ko'ed him.. Cuz of his stamina...
2. Kessler pwned andrade, and tryed to knock him out in last round, even tho kessler had tryed to knock andrade out for so many rounds..

3) fact: kessler went 12 rounds with a better boxer than froch: Calzaghe, and kessler had stamina enough to try the knockout in the last round in that fight.
Kessler went 12 rounds with andrade, who have the best chin atm i think..

So how can froch beat kessler? He must fight a better fight than calzaghe.......

Cuz kessler would beat calzaghe in a remach, cuz he now knows how to fight a very aquard fighter..

 

I'll bump this when Froch Ko's the robotic predictable slow kessler.

 

He wont :good

 

He will :deal

 

Dream on :!:

 

Again
I just don't understand some peoples comprehension on things.
First - no one commented on the fact that JC had more KOs within 25 fights than Froch but NO one calls JC a hard puncher. ???
Or how you can say Kessler is a slow robotic fighter.
That would mean Froch is a snail.
That KO combo on Haussler was fast.

 

Yeah! Take that! Shoving a well-reasoned insightful post in his face will really show us something! Hell, you didn't even have to make a single relevant point or observation to totally own. You go, girl! :good

 

dude how can you question kesslers stamina, i mean come on how many boxers can keep up with calzaghe for 12 rounds...theres no shame in taking a breather.

personally i reckon kessler would sneak it, froch is slower and too predictable. kessler is patient and better technique and throws real effective upprecuts which will hit froch all day long,

 

The mach wont be so tuff, that kessler needs to use his uppercut skills.... Kessler will just invite froch in, step back and 123 jabs... Froch aint gonna challenge kessler, so kessler would go defense and counter with uppercuts.. no no.. Kessler will for sure, keep froch in a good distance, and jab him to hell!

 

Froch has the better wins ...

Taylor
Pascal....far out do Mundine and beyer.

Froch winS THIS ONE AS LONG AS ITS NOT IN dENMARK....kessler is hugely over rated...on ESB

Froch aint special...but he doesnt need to be to beat this guy

 

Froch really wants to out-do calzaghe lol. He'll want kessler, believing he can win..and theres a chance he could-maybe even ko him.

But kessler looks like the real deal. hes probably the best SW out t here right now. I wouldnt count out froch tho.

 

Kessler wants Froch, Froch wants Kessler. It should be simple...
There´s something rotten in the state of Denmark.

 

Froch also wants Hopkins, Bute, and Calzaghe.

 

Calzaghe admittedly couldn't pivot for **** - at least later on in his career. He threw a lot of arm punches, and didn't put his body weight into punches.......not to mention he punched a lot with the inside of his glove. Early on in his career he had decent power.....also, he had such good movement and speed he didn't need to rely on his power; but you'll notice he threw a lot of pitty pat **** and at the end of a combination, when he had an opening he would put some musturd on it.

But no, Calzaghe was never a KO artist.