Carl Froch should NOT be fighting for the Ring Title

Bute beating a guy Froch already beat is gonna prove what exactly ? The only think Bute is proven is that he is consistent in taking on Froch's leftovers. Magee and now Johnson,.

 

Of course it is. Not because either of them have belts around their waists, but because they are #1 and #2.

Drinker's logic is different though, because neither of these are the Ring champion. Martinez vs Barker was for the Ring title, it's not a question of being worthy when there's a champion.

 

Then you either;

A) Don't know how rankings work

or

A) Are a literal ******

Which is it, A or A?

 

Then you are clearly a mong.

 

Kessler has the win over Froch so you can at least make a case for ranking him higher. Bute on the other hand has no case at all to be ranked over Froch.

 

Froch is better than Bute. Who the **** has Bute fought and has he ever left Canada for a fight.... :yep

 

Then he needs to step up his quality of opposition and prove it. Until then Froch has the better wins and the higher ranking.

 

Is that with 3 minute rounds or 3 min 20 second rounds?

 

Jermain Taylor is also clearly a better boxer than Froch, your point is meaningless.

 

Bute and Kessler do clearly have a case, Kessler beat Froch and has remained unbeaten... Bute wasn't in the super 6 but clearly has shown enough to be a real threat.