Carl Froch should NOT be fighting for the Ring Title

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Drinker, Oct 27, 2011.


  1. johnson is and old man now way past his best , yet he is by far the best opponent bute has ever faced, i mean ppl like bute are what i hate in boxing going an entire career facing electricians and fat injured old men whos claim to fame is being a contestant on the ''contender show'', and then fanboys come on here and claim hel beat elite fighters like froch etc with absolutely no evidence to support there case.
     
  2. Mandanda

    Mandanda SkillspayBills Full Member

    25,993
    3
    Oct 21, 2008
    I'll look forward to Bute tasting a few Johnson right hands..
     
  3. Scotty321

    Scotty321 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,516
    0
    Dec 21, 2008
    Bute loves Frochs leftovers. AA or Robin Reed next?
     
  4. Drinker

    Drinker Guest

    the evidence comes from watching him fight. He has beaten plenty of decent names.
     
  5. Drinker

    Drinker Guest


    Johnson won't get near him.
     
  6. Mandanda

    Mandanda SkillspayBills Full Member

    25,993
    3
    Oct 21, 2008
    Arh suppose your right all them masterful displays against Brinkley,Mendy there's no way someone like Grandpa Johnson can get near him even though Brian Magee landed on him a fair few times early.

    Bute's list of opponents is a disgrace..Johnson will land that right hand at times in the fight. Bute's got some nice moves but if he was a fighter of any worth he'd of faced tougher opponents by now and even this isn't the greatest step up but it's still a step up from the **** he's been facing.
     
  7. Scotty321

    Scotty321 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,516
    0
    Dec 21, 2008
    Hopefully it'll be before the 12th and the bought ref can't save him this time:yep
     
  8. Mandanda

    Mandanda SkillspayBills Full Member

    25,993
    3
    Oct 21, 2008
    :yep :good
     
  9. WalletInspector

    WalletInspector Obsessed with Boxing banned

    21,194
    2
    Jan 1, 2010
    And then he was allowed to have the same ref for the Mendy fight! :nut
     
  10. sud2002

    sud2002 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,059
    0
    Feb 11, 2011
    Saying Bute can't beat better opponents is like saying someone like BJS isn't going be able to beat top 10 domestic fighters.

    But we've seen enough evidence to suggest BJS can go at least further than domestic level and people would agree, but using the same analogy people wouldn't say Bute would beat better opponents than he already has.

    It's quite clear the he deserves a shout to be the top guy at super middleweight.
     
  11. qwert

    qwert Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,544
    68
    Dec 22, 2009
    Are you saying BJS deserves a shout to be the top guy at middleweight?
     
  12. Mandanda

    Mandanda SkillspayBills Full Member

    25,993
    3
    Oct 21, 2008
    BJS is a prospect and a young one at that, Bute holds a version of a world title and his fanboys claim he's the #1 at SMW. Clear difference no matter how much talent someone shows when he's doing it at a low level people are entitled to question if he's that good when he's fought not one real world class fighter. Bika is best operator on his record IMO and he's a fringe level operator who knows how to lose well against the world class fighters. Joppy was done by then and was never that great anyways..
     
  13. cumon now, like i said hes a good little fighter, but he has literally no notable wins on his resume, sakio bika, william joppy please! lol
    look at frochs more recent opponents: johnson, aa, kessler, dirrel, taylor, pascal.
     
  14. dempseys right

    dempseys right Active Member Full Member

    822
    0
    Aug 9, 2011
    I thought Froch just beat Kessler or at worse a draw, and deserves to fight Ward for the honour as much as anyone else at 168. IMO.
     
  15. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    Thats different from ranking a fighter who you think could beat better opponents higher than someone who actually has beaten better oppponents.

    People don't currently rank Saunders over the likes of Barker, Mackin or Murray just because of potential. They rank the other guys higher because they have beaten better fighters than Saunders.