Carl Froch still doesn't have an opponent !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If any fighter would be excused for taking a soft touch, it would be Froch. The man fought a brutal fight with Kessler and took a ton of shots from Ward. Luckily, Bute turned out to be a lot easier than projected.

I wouldn't bash him for taking a fringe level guy at home.

 

And what other slick Americans are there at 168 anyway? Froch is rightfully rated ABOVE Dirrell, whom he beat already. So why would he have to face him again? Since that fight, Dirrell has done NOTHING at 168. Dirrell is actually the one who DUCKED a fight with a slick american in Ward ******. Dirrell is the one who needs to step up and beat guys closer to his level to seperate himself from them. Guys like Ward, Kessler, and Froch are a level above Dirrell.

 

This content is protected

:yep:deal


Scotty ( PrinceN ), we understand that you support very much your boyfriend but accept that Froch is the man / a G and Dirrell is

This content is protected

! :yep:deal

 

When did Froch say this? Or are you just making more bull**** up?

Dirrell is not even slick atsch

 

don't play this **** with me gilfoid ! YOU'RE ! cool:

 

PrinceN is taking an asswhooping in this thread

 

He may have beaten him in your head, but it was close enough to render that opinion of yours useless. And since that fight, Froch has distanced himself from Dirrell. But like I asked, what other slick americans are there that you think Froch will avoid? Or that he even NEEDS to fight? Dirrell is BELOW Froch as it stands.

And just because you THINK Dirrell beats Kessler, he hasn't done that. And he too is ranked below Kessler.

So what exactly was the point of this? To tell people Froch doesn't have any opponent? IS that is? Well great, you've provided nothing that looking at a schedule doesn't already say.

And lets get this straight, it's DIRRELL who's ducked the slick American, not Froch.

 

#teamGilfoid :yep

 

Come on Prince answer. Find me that source for this