Carl Froch... The new Marciano?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Neverchair, Feb 28, 2010.


  1. Neverchair

    Neverchair Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,318
    2
    Oct 19, 2008
    No. It was a bit of fun. Nothing pointless about that but humour doesn't seem to be your strong point.

    A forum isn't supposed to "work" in any predefined way. That makes you sound very insular and closed to change.

    This thread isnt even about Rocky Marciano. Its about Carl Froch. Read the original post again.

    You seem to hold your own opinion in extremely high regard and have little time for anyone else's regarding some as "ignorant statements" that you feel it is your job to come and fix. You seem to revel in a pretentious elitism in which you believe your knowledge of boxing gives you the right to berate other people who you feel know less than you. Chillax dude.

    But I know you wont.:-(
     
  2. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    That's fair enough. I am a snob. I listen to a lot of other peoples opinions, I don't know everything. Some posters irk me, such as yourself, so I go off on one.
    :good I don't like your posts, you don't like mine. Agree to disagree :good
     
  3. Neverchair

    Neverchair Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,318
    2
    Oct 19, 2008
    Actually I agree with some of your posts (not on this thread though, obviously) just dont start getting shitty and pompous when you when you see something you dont agree with.

    Take heed of your own words and agree to disagree from the start. Dont do it days later after arguing the toss and insulting people on the way. Particularly if you're going to take offence to the insults you get thrown back.
     
  4. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    I was responding to your thread though pal. The argument was that Froch was similarly regarded to Rocky in terms of not being regarded very highly skillwise but kept on winning. My original point was to point out that they weren't similar as Rocky was better thsnyou gave him credit for.

    So there was really no need for any of this :lol: :good
     
  5. Neverchair

    Neverchair Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,318
    2
    Oct 19, 2008
    It was more to do with Froch not getting credit for winning because of his style whereas Marciano gets tons of credit regardless of his style.

    But hey ho!
     
  6. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    5
    Jul 21, 2008
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJTBPdVpdMc[/ame]
     
  7. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Fair enough. I will add that Marciano is the most lambasted fighter in Heavyweight history. But I see what you mean :good
     
  8. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
  9. Will

    Will Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,403
    3
    Aug 4, 2009
    Audley Harrison clearly has that title.
     
  10. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Heavyweight champ then. Or maybe that's Carnera, which is also unfair IMO