Hi There all this talk of Froch v Benn, got me thinking how do you see match up between froch and these 3 below going: James Cook Steve Collins Michael Watson
Froch is a strong, hard dude but Watson and Collins were stronger and harder. Watson would cover up and counter in combinations to outwork Carl toe-to-toe, and Collins had the sneakiest counter overarm right of a fighter who wasn't named Eubank - to take advantage of the low-slung left and poor reflexes.
Froch is a strong, hard dude but Watson and Collins were stronger and harder. This content is protected This content is protected
i think collins is the hardest pick of the lot,watson beats him quite easy,he beats cook quite easy:hey but collins is like froch in many ways,not the greatest of boxers,but his rock hardness got him a long way,just like froch,be a war really