Carl Froch V 90's super middleweights (Collins, Cook and Watson)

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by southpaw21, May 30, 2012.


  1. southpaw21

    southpaw21 Member Full Member

    114
    0
    Nov 7, 2011
    Hi There :D

    all this talk of Froch v Benn, got me thinking how do you see match up between froch and these 3 below going:

    James Cook
    Steve Collins
    Michael Watson
     
  2. No Fear

    No Fear Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,973
    0
    Sep 6, 2008
    Right now, The Cobra beats Jesus Christ himself in a one sided beat down, of biblical proportions.
     
  3. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    He rewrites the Bible.
     
  4. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    Froch is a strong, hard dude but Watson and Collins were stronger and harder. Watson would cover up and counter in combinations to outwork Carl toe-to-toe, and Collins had the sneakiest counter overarm right of a fighter who wasn't named Eubank - to take advantage of the low-slung left and poor reflexes.
     
  5. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    Jimmy Cook was OK. I think Froch has heavy hands and can find Cook's chin if he doesn't load up.
     
  6. poloaa009

    poloaa009 New Member Full Member

    58
    0
    May 9, 2012
    Froch is a strong, hard dude but Watson and Collins were stronger and harder.
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  7. widdy

    widdy lancs,where real men live Full Member

    5,747
    0
    Aug 19, 2008
    i think collins is the hardest pick of the lot,watson beats him quite easy,he beats cook quite easy:hey

    but collins is like froch in many ways,not the greatest of boxers,but his rock hardness got him a long way,just like froch,be a war really
     
  8. joe33

    joe33 Guest

    Froch is a strong, hard dude but Watson and Collins were stronger and harder.