Carl Froch V Kelly Pavlik

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by JonOli, Oct 9, 2008.


  1. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    Carl Froch V Kelly Pavlik (at SM), who wins?


    Also what similarities, and differences do you think these two have?

    Perhaps it's just me but they both appear to have similar spindly physiques.

    Both obviously have power as well - Froch holds his guard a lot lower though...

    What do you think? Be interesting to hear peoples views...
     
  2. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    Froch is not as skinny as him at all.
     
  3. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    Yea, pavlik is a bit taller but they seem to have the same shape to me - perhaps it's just me. Pavlik wouldn't be as skinny moving up to SM don't forget. Froch would be as skinny making middle.
     
  4. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    37
    Jan 7, 2005
    I really don't know, both fighters still have things to prove at world level to me.
     
  5. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    Pavlik is not a bad opponent for him. Questionable chin, pretty basic technical pressure with no frills, leaky defence. Not difficult to catch cleanly, which gives The Cobra a massive chance.

    On the other hand his low hands are worrying as Pavlik is an accurate straight puncher. Also his laziness could be a problem when put under consistent pressure.
     
  6. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Pavlik is so over-rated on the General Forum it beggars belief.

    They seem to forget that not only was he one clean shot away from a second round blowout loss against Taylor, that he was also losing the fight pretty handily until the seventh.

    The low left could cause Froch a problem, but if that was rectified I would back him to beat Pavlik.
     
  7. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    Yea, I must admit that there are still more questions then answers with these two.

    When I think of these two though I just see something similar between them both but I cant quite put my finger on what it is.
     
  8. 1stcontact

    1stcontact Like Mo, But Better Full Member

    1,797
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    The fact they both wanna fight calzaghe perhaps:yep
     
  9. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    Froch cannot be ko'd :)

    I'm not sure if he'd win more than 2 rounds v Pavlik. Pavlik has way too much for him.
     
  10. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    5
    Jul 21, 2008
    I really have not seen enough from froch to be able to judge who wins this fight just yet - lets see how both of their next fights turn out then it may become clearer.
     
  11. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    27,158
    2
    Apr 24, 2008
    I've voted Pavlik on points, BUT Froch has decent power and could cause KP some serious problems...more so than Lockett at least :p
     
  12. cityofgod

    cityofgod Worcester warrior Full Member

    2,210
    0
    Feb 13, 2008
    Froch is a murderous puncher.

    I'd take Froch to take Pavlik's '0' if they ever met.

    I've never been overly impressed by Jermain Taylor and just because Kelly beat Taylor don't really get me erect.

    Little Ouma closed Taylor's eye and Spinks, a welter, nearly outboxed him over 12.
     
  13. Primadonna Kool

    Primadonna Kool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,545
    7
    Dec 5, 2006
    Cark Froch is a wasted talented, why the **** does he fight every 10 years..
     
  14. dwilson

    dwilson Guest

    This would be a good fight. Kelly is the best middleweight around and Froch is a top 5 super middle so a fight between the two would be a must see.
     
  15. Benjiabc

    Benjiabc The Nottingham Hitman Full Member

    4,429
    15
    Oct 2, 2006
    this would certainly be a very interesting fight indeed one i have myself speculated many times before.


    pavlik has the far greater work rate and is a very good accurate puncher with good power, and decent variation. However jermain taylor isnt the hardest puncher in the world and he very nearly knocked pavlik out. The fights with jermain also showed me that pavlik is not particuarly difficult to hit.

    i am still unsure about froch, he has never really looked like losing and usually puts on a good performance which ends in a knockout, however he has never fought anyone close to pavliks level and due to him having low hands and being extremely lazy at times, he could find himself in alot of trouble


    i see too possible outcomes for this fight.


    either pavlik outworks froch and has him hurt, doesnt knock him out but goes on to win a reasonably easy UD


    or froch knocks pavlik out reasonably early.



    i think i favour the later