Carl Froch v Tommy Burns

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, Jul 3, 2018.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,754
    46,442
    Feb 11, 2005
    You've got the mortgage money burning a hole in yer pocket. You got the Burns from the Johnson fight versus the Froch from the Bute fight. Who you laying money on?
     
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,754
    46,442
    Feb 11, 2005
    Hmmm... No other 168 pounder was ever able to KD Froch, right? But Tommy Burns will turn the trick?
     
  3. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,754
    46,442
    Feb 11, 2005
    That's right. Taylor had him down. I'd take Taylor over Burns, too.
     
  4. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,493
    3,720
    Apr 20, 2010
    I believe George Groves was a 168 pounder, too.
     
    Colonel Sanders likes this.
  5. Colonel Sanders

    Colonel Sanders Pounchin powar calculateur Full Member

    2,372
    87
    Sep 13, 2012
  6. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,754
    46,442
    Feb 11, 2005
    One can only assume. Unless Burns waddles his fine set of Nova Scotia birthing hips into position to trap Groves in a corner and smothers him. That potentialoty can not be ruled out
     
    Last edited: Jul 4, 2018
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Froch KO 5 Burns
     
    Seamus likes this.
  8. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,595
    27,267
    Feb 15, 2006
    Froch is tailor made for Burns.

    I know that we have said that about him relative to some of his real world victims, but I think that it this case the prophecy would come true.
     
  9. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    froch doesnt defend aganst bums