Carl Froch vs 19-3-1 Nicholson Poulard

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by iceman71, Aug 18, 2012.


  1. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,565
    83,428
    Nov 30, 2006
    He's rated #6 and is the WBA's North American champion. Shumenov was in his future all along until Froch swooped in with that alternate offer.

    IMO Froch vs. Poulard shouldn't have ever been discussed. Shumenov vs. Poulard might not be the greatest world title bout, but there have been worse. (Magee vs. Barboza, anyone? Golovkin vs. Tapia or Nunez?) It's at least 'legit' in the sense that Poulard has achieved a top ten ranking in that particular weight class in that particular organization. Froch vs. Poulard would have just been out of ****ing nowhere with no substantiating rationalization available.
     
  2. Badlok

    Badlok Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,616
    0
    Nov 15, 2008
    :think good question , but it wasn't the IBF that was asking for the remtach but the contract si i guess no , or maybe yes if Bute drop the clause , bu knowing Bute he will want to avenge the lost no mather what
     
  3. bamboleo

    bamboleo Still Proud to be Butard Full Member

    978
    0
    Apr 5, 2011
    I'm afraid Froch would not want a rematch with Bute and try to make some waves at 175 which is understandable for him but bad for Bute and me as a fan.
     
  4. Tyler-Durden

    Tyler-Durden Boxing Junkie banned

    11,190
    1
    Mar 24, 2010
    Oh ****, I misread :lol:

    I thought it was Froch who was going to concentrate on Shumenov. :patsch Bomboleo that's how you understood it too, right ? :yep
     
  5. PR BOXING

    PR BOXING Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,669
    12
    Feb 4, 2010
    Froch FANS. . . . . . . What happened with earning your tittle shots and generating money for the fight to make sense? I thought you need to work your way up before challenging Froch. ****ing hypocrite duckers
     
  6. bamboleo

    bamboleo Still Proud to be Butard Full Member

    978
    0
    Apr 5, 2011
    Yeah, :lol:
     
  7. PityTheFool

    PityTheFool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,192
    6
    Oct 18, 2011
    On first read I was the same but the statement put me right.
    Don't sweat it mate.That was an easy one to misread.
     
  8. Tyler-Durden

    Tyler-Durden Boxing Junkie banned

    11,190
    1
    Mar 24, 2010
    Haha I was so glad Poulard is not his next fight that I didn't even read it twice. :!: Then I read IB's post and thought something was wrong. :yep
     
  9. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    Voluntary doesnt mean he can fight a guy making his pro debut does it?

    i guess it turns out most boxing fans are just that dumb.

    they say its ok to break this rule but not ok to break other rules.

    the guy is not even ranked at 168 by the IBF

    he is ranked # 61 by boxrec at 175

    take the title out of the headline then it doesnt matter.

    there are other scrubs ranked in the IBF top 15 he can fight where at least its in the rules. not sure why everyone doesnt get that. :-(
     
  10. Tyler-Durden

    Tyler-Durden Boxing Junkie banned

    11,190
    1
    Mar 24, 2010
    **** it, I agree with this. :hat
     
  11. mr fists

    mr fists Active Member Full Member

    939
    0
    Sep 17, 2010
    Well, froch is entitled to an easy fight, but this is a bit ridiculous.
     
  12. heehoo

    heehoo TIMEXICAH! Full Member

    3,763
    13
    Feb 16, 2008
    I don't get why people are saying Bite is elite, he hasn't the chin nor the movement to avoid Froch just walking towards him and banging on him.
     
  13. Badlok

    Badlok Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,616
    0
    Nov 15, 2008
    Big money for Froch to face Bute though :think
     
  14. Badlok

    Badlok Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,616
    0
    Nov 15, 2008
    :lol: it wasn't clear , i admit :smoke
     
  15. Badlok

    Badlok Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,616
    0
    Nov 15, 2008
    It thought my Froch fans friends were smarter then this :-(