Carl Froch vs Jake Lamotta at 168

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by kovalevtheGoat, Aug 24, 2014.


  1. kovalevtheGoat

    kovalevtheGoat The Chelyabinsk Machine banned Full Member

    5,600
    78
    Jul 28, 2014
    Advantages to Both men.

    Both very tough but jake is probably tougher.
    Both very fit but jakes stamina was relentless.
    Both packed a decent punch but carl has the more Ko Power.
    Both have average speed and are probably even in this department.
    Physical advantages go to Carl Froch with about 4inches height and a huge 9inch reach advantage.
    Both defences were supsetible to quick boxers with straight shots, lamotta probably rolled and slipped in better, and would need to roll in against froch's superior jab.

    So who wins and how i only made this thread as Jake lamotta was a big hefty muscular middleweight and i bet he weighed in about 165-170 at fight night.
     
  2. Meazy-E

    Meazy-E Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,701
    20
    Aug 8, 2012
    Same day weigh ins, I don't think Lamotta was 170 fight night, also he seemed to have a good amount of physical strength to rough up opponents as opposed to punching power. Also Jake gives up an 8 inch reach advantage as well as 5 inches of height. That along with weight differential gives Carl a huge edge, and Jake just wasn't polished or technical enough to overcome the adversity that Froch would become. And he also doesn't have explosive one punch KO power to equalize.
     
  3. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    Froch would be a L-HW cum HW in Jakes time, and Jake would be a Jr MW cum MW in Carl's time, an unlikely match!
     
  4. ForemanJab

    ForemanJab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,987
    12,303
    May 8, 2014
    The only question is whether Froch could stop him within the distance.
     
  5. Bullet

    Bullet Member Full Member

    484
    10
    Jul 24, 2014
    Froch would be fighting Rocky Marciano in those days.
     
  6. kovalevtheGoat

    kovalevtheGoat The Chelyabinsk Machine banned Full Member

    5,600
    78
    Jul 28, 2014
    And how much would marciano weigh nowadays.
     
  7. Bullet

    Bullet Member Full Member

    484
    10
    Jul 24, 2014
    Not that much more honestly looking at his frame.
     
  8. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
    LaMotta knocked out Bob Satterfield who would have knocked Froch's dick in the dirt.
     
  9. ForemanJab

    ForemanJab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,987
    12,303
    May 8, 2014
    Doubtful. Satterfield had a china chin and terrible stamina. Froch would have KO'd him.
     
  10. Meazy-E

    Meazy-E Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,701
    20
    Aug 8, 2012
    :deal Half of bob's losses were by KO or TKO.
     
  11. Bullet

    Bullet Member Full Member

    484
    10
    Jul 24, 2014
    Too many guys beat Satterfield though.
     
  12. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    an early Satterfield too, all these facts count for something, unless of course you try to blind swipe that by people... Jake too was pushed and stretched in his peak years by Welters cum Middles, smaller men. pertinent facts also.

    as I said in my original post, "in each others time, they never would have met."
     
  13. Big George

    Big George Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,867
    20
    Jan 16, 2011
    I really like Froch, but against Lamotta? He gets KO'd in the 3rd round. Froch fold and taste canvas like a little *****.... Modern day Euro-fighter. Definitely not ol'school skills or mindset.
     
  14. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
    Froch knocking out Satterfield. LOL. Froch beating LaMotta at any weight is ****ing laughable. I realize hes popular across the pond but hes certainly nothing special.
     
  15. big_AL

    big_AL P4P #1 Full Member

    2,410
    59
    Jul 22, 2010
    Laughable? really? :patsch

    For the record, I think Froch's superior reacha nd height wpuld play a hug factor as both are even in many other departments (strength, resilience, power, speed etc.) with La Motta having the slightly tougher chin. If Froch can establish the jab, he wins.

    If La Motta is on a good night and is hell bent on winning, slipping and sliding, relentlessly trying to find his way in (think the first Robinson fight), it's a tough night for Carl i.e. the Glen Johnson fight X10