Carl Froch

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Apr 26, 2010.


  1. Elvizzz

    Elvizzz Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,035
    550
    Jun 29, 2008
    I agree... Thought the Dirrell fight was closer then the Kessler fight, but the right winner took both fights IMO.
     
  2. Kid Presentable

    Kid Presentable Facial Blocking Full Member

    2,818
    1
    Sep 14, 2008
    i thought he lost both but no offence to froch both were very close and LUFCrazy i admire your respect for froch.Calzaghe fans are just idiots anyways. Froch fought Pascal taylor dirrell kessler and now abraham in a row even if he lost those fights still better than fighting mario veit twice.
     
  3. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    Why?
    Veit has accomplished more overall at SMW than Pascal did, more than Dirrell has, more than Taylor did and more than Abraham has at SMW. Obviously Taylor, Pascal and Abraham have done more overall by winning world titles (not at SMW) but Veit has done more at SMW than those fighters and accomplished more than Dirrell
     
  4. oksehud

    oksehud Member Full Member

    380
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    ^That
     
  5. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,285
    5,911
    Oct 5, 2009
    I gave the first to froch by a point but had 4 swing rounds

    he lost the second one
     
  6. si_19

    si_19 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,568
    0
    Nov 10, 2007
    I had him winning both
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,698
    21,968
    Sep 15, 2009
    both fights were close, i gave froch the nod, but i got no problems with the kessler win.

    and im not sure if you did that on purpose, highlighting the LUFC in my name lol, but a lot of yanks on here dont have a clue that relates to leeds lol.

    i do agree on the resume issue, he hasnt had an easy fight in years, calzaghe has achieved more over all, but he did have a lot of meaningless fights.