yeah carl froch resumé has depth when it come to fighting guys that ain't SMW and ain't got world class experience at SMW:think Jermain Taylor was 1-0 at 168atsch post froch got ko'd Arthur Abraham was 1-1 at 168atsch pre froch got beat post froch got beat Glen Johnson was 6-6 at 168:huh The fighter's he fought that are his own weight andre dirrell not world class no world class experienceatsch post froch got ko'd by a MW but won by DQ jean pascal was not world class had no world class experienceatschpost froch got beat twice by a 46yr old man:shock: when carl froch fought someone proven at elite level what HAPPENED?... [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qcQKBJ4VdA&feature=player_detailpage[/ame]
Will Dirrell more than likely become world class? Pascal has done so, and you've got absolutely no proof to say he improved for the step up in weight, and you know it. And seeing as you're still going on about Froch's defeat, you are still showing yourself to have no idea. Are you not embarassed by that, as well as the fact you're referring to defeats from over 10 years ago which have no relevance now?
carl froch defeat was not 10 years ago and if a guy had a defeat 100 year ago it still has relevance nowatsch Will Dirrell more than likely become world class?.. [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocsiyWuAOEw&feature=player_detailpage[/ame]
I was talking about Johnson you moron, and a defeat many years ago has no relevance to ability at a later date, which means it has no place in this discussion. Simple enough for your ******ed self?
glen johnson is a glorified bum with 15 L and 2 draws, he's only won 2 fights out of the 9 world title fights he was in. The guy won a vacant title then beat a 35yr old who just come off a brutal 2 round knockout and you yanks think johnson is the goods?....atsch what did he do pre 2004?......:huh what did he do post 2004?...:huh:huh . STOP THE HYPE THE GUYS A BUM
Exactly, Glen Johnsons a complete bum, a gatekeeper at best His biggest bragging point of his career is being in talks with Calzaghe twice while Calzaghe had serious injuries.atsch:roll::rofl I like how people think Joe would have been scared of pipsqueek Johnson who was outboxed numerous times, but then took on an unbeaten destroyer in Kessler, or tried to take on Hopkins before Hop chickened out ( the same Hop that ****ed up gatekeeper Johnson) atsch I also like how everyones so livid that when a thread is made about a boxer, Calzaghe becomes the yardstick to everythinglol:
Shut the **** up you **** lunch..... The supermiddleweight division is in a better state than when Joe Calzaghe fought in it and thats a fact, i dont know why the **** you are dissing him.
I have no problem with Calzaghe great champion, but you got to give it to Froch his resume in two fights time if he wins will make him the best supermiddleweight Britain has produced...
:rofl There is only one person in this thread who can't handle the truth! He can't even respond with anything good. **** lunch!!:rofl:rofl:rofl
Mate, do you not like boxing and only like Joe Calzaghe? You sound either in Love with Joe at the expense of all other fighters or just a Froch hater. As a Joe fan you should know that anyone can rip apart a resume, it means shi*t! Froch has fought everyone he can and no doubt will fight more highly competitive fights in the future. It's not like he's taken any "easy fights". The division isn't superstar level, but it is competitive with many good fighters. The thing I love about Froch is every fight, people say he's slow, defense is sh*t, overated power etc and he pulls out the win/competitive performance. Stop hating. Also the guy that said Joe ducked Pavlik, please..... RJJ for millions or Pavlik for millions less. Hmmmm, what would I do?!?!?
Why not just post **** like the thread starter, why should i post anything intelligent when the thread starter is trolling of the highest order. :good