Your opnion, Your Opnion, mine is Hagler defended his titles against better competition than Monzon did, and far better than Griffith did. He defeated Tiger in 1966, he was in his prime, but that doesn't mean he was a big Middle,it means he was just a better fighter than Tiger was.He was a small middle, and a natural welter. I won't get into your boxing on and off, comment you made because I never mentioned that with you. But know this, this site is about opinions, and points of view. I don't question your knowledge of the boxing, but I do question your humility.