How can Ali's list of opponents possibly be better other than him inventing a Time Machine? Aha, I get it, the legendary 'ducking' of Danny McAlinden fiasco. :hey
I am trying to get hold of the Argentinian news paper i read it, if i find it i will scan and PM you. Obviously it has its limitations because most Argie papers will support an Argie over the Brazilian. I dont think that fight is too much of a blip for Monzon anyway considering Monzon had been pro for 14 months and Cambeiro had been pro for 7 years. Especially taking into account Monzon avenged his loss just over one year later.
I don't. When I'm feeling enthusiastic about something, I'll often say "great", "fantastic", "superb" etc, without giving much thought to the hierarchy of superlatives. And you shouldn't attach too much importance to the branding of the term "very good" in this case, as I explained on page uno:
I wasn't being a **** mate, don't be touchy, I was just being curious, and I was being very respectful in my approach. Forgive me for taking posts as I read them, no damage done.
I don't see why there's a reason to be a 'defender' of any fighter either, or why being a fan should come into it. There should only be being objective in debates such as these.
Yawn. When a fighter is often subject to unwarranted criticism, as Duran often is, I find myself defending him against this quite regularly. Someone who defends someone frequently is a defender of that person. Double yawn. This is the kind of boring, pointless, petty, pedantic crap that makes me avoid particular posters like the plague of hell.
I like reading Teeto's posts, he clearly knows his stuff, I just don't like interacting with him, think he is a right *******. Thus, I prefer us not to speak to each other, then I can enjoy his insights without having to expend time and energy dealing with his neuroses directly. I think that system works for both of us.