I made a similar thread the other day trying to get a good profile of former Bantamweight king Orlando Canizales. Same thing here, I've been watching some of Zarate's fights on youtube. His wonderful shootout against undefeated Alfonso Zamora, a fight he won by stoppage in the 4th round thanks to a well placed left hook. I've watched his stoppages over Paul Ferreri and Danilo Batista, also. From my observations, I see a lot of similarities with Alexis Arguello. They both have that tall and rangy frame, but are super skinny which allows them to make their respective weights. Also, like Arguello, Zarate is very methodical with what he throws, very accurate, and his left hand seemed to every bit as important as his right, if not more so. Was Zarate a left hander fighting orthodox? What can you tell me about Carlos Zarate? Where does he rank all-time as a Bantamweight? Where does he rank p4p All-time? What were his strengths outside of his discombobulating power in both hands? Weaknesses? Did he deserve the nod over Pintor up at 118lbs? A lot of questions.
I think of him as a very fine general. He was good at establishing range and his jab, and if he felt like things were getting hot out of time he could back up a bit after feeling out his man. A proper box-puncher with one of the best left-hooks to the body i've seen. They sometimes strayed though, and he got away with punches he wouldn't now.
Thanks McGrain, I saw the lovely body work in his fight with Danilo Batista. He seemed to throw the jab, right hand, and the left to the body...a vintage Mexican combination. My preconceived notions were that Zarate was nothing but a banger, who tried to land as often as possible, obviously to score a stoppage with his amazing power. That wasn't the case from what I saw. He was very careful with what shots he threw, and nearly all the shots he landed flush seemed to take an effect.
He was organised and balanced, too, so he could afford to take risks. Missing wasn't the end of the world for him.
Absolutely. Zamora, another big banger, landed some very hard shots on Carlos before the third round. This suggests to me in addition to everything we've already touched upon, Carlos had a very sturdy chin. There's no shame in moving up to Super Bantamweight and getting stopped by Wilfredo Gomez.
He's up there as an all time great bantam alongside Jofre, Olivares and Ortiz. Not the same depth of record, but a high level of dominance. The complete package as a boxer puncher: perfect textbook technique and great ring generalship fused with toughness and brutal power. There are some similarities with Arguello, with Zarate being better at tracking an opponent down IMO, although he didn't face Arguello's level of competition in a p4p sense. I'm not sure if he was a left-handed though. I'd rank him behind Jofre, Olivares, Ortiz and maybe a couple of others. But he's right up there, even if Gomez did take him out at super bantam, a sign of Gomez's quality rather than any deficiency on Zarate's part. Wonderful fighter.
i need to see more of Zarate I thinkhe is morerigid than Arguello and Arguello is smoother an dmore fluid but they are similar. I need to wathc the Zamora fight again
No doubt about it. Zarate doesn't seem fluid or smooth at all, but he delivers his punches with the same kind of precision as Alexis did, and his left hook was a big part of his offensive arsenal, much like it was for Alexis.
I suppose you could say he was more rigid in a sense. But his stance seemed more relaxed than Arguello's to me, which isn't a criticism - just a rough observation. He did well with opponents who allowed him to fight at his own pace as well as aggressive opponents, which is why I can imagine him using his height and range to track down and beat someone like Rose. Arguello was the greater fighter over the course of a fight though: stronger in the championship rounds and with slightly better timing and punch selection. A greater champion all in all.
H2H, Zarate would've been a tough task for any bantam. However, as someone else said, he lacks the depth of resume/achievements as some of the other great bantams, which makes him a bit difficult to rank. For example, I think he had a good style to beat Olivares, but if you rank them based on actual achievements, Olivares would probably rank higher. Zarate's defining moment was his explosive win over the long reigning KO artist Zamora. However, he also milked his title against a number of undeserving/undistinguished nobodies, and his championship career came to a very sudden and anti-climactic end. I do believe he probably should've gotten the decision over Pintor, but it was a close fight and a disappointing performance from both fighters. Personally, I've always suspected that the Gomez loss took some of Zarate's confidence and will, as he seemed somewhat gun-shy and reluctant to trade against Pintor - unusual for Zarate. I suspect that, more than the "bad" decision, may have been what persuaded Zarate to retire, right when he still should've been in his prime.
I've always thought that Zarate had a good style for tackling Olivares. Castillo and Herrera were both able to press the unmotivated, half-arsed version of Olivares, therefore you'd expect Zarate to be able to do the same thing. His power and composure under fire could well give a new meaning to 'Rockabye Ruben'. Then again, Olivares being Olivares, it wouldn't surprise me to see him either outmanoevre Zarate as he did Arguello for long periods, or even blow him out of the water like Gomez did.
I've felt this way too, although it's hard to be sure one way or the other. Did you ever take another look at Zarate-Fenech? As to Olivares v Zarate, it's hard for me to imagine a better fight. 3 or 4 rounds of feeling each-other out then total war juxtaposed with 1st class boxing as Zarate (most likely) disengaged. It would be awesome. I don't make a pick.
Great avatar Addie. You know i like him h2h. He could be countered in the pocket but it was rarely that he was at a disadvantage there. His power was thudding with even brushing shots sometimes, and his finishing was great. Good technical skills and for box-punching/box-fighting he is top level possible. You can detract from his legacy with depth of resume though, and that can be justified. To rank him above some of the usual suspects you need to establish a criteria set unless you are ready to come under criticism. His ko ratio was 95%. Could cut off a ring a bit like the Joe Louis way, little shifts followed by bombs landing. Maybe a bit more comparable to Arguello in that respect. His fight with Pintor was at 118 though i thought. It's one of the toughest fights to score of all time, i had an absolute nightmare first time round, lost count of score around round 13, and just left it for about a year before doing so again. I can't even remember who i had but i really think it was Zarate. If you have him beating Pintor then you've got a platform to build your argument for him rankings wise.
Right you are, Teeto. It was at Bantamweight, I got confused for a minute there. As I've said before, I hear conflicting reports. Some say it was a robbery, some say it was an extremely close fight that could have been scored either way. Zarate was adamant that he had won the fight, and consequently left the sport, ala Marvin Hagler.