That is ****ing tripe, though. Bad as Clay looked in that fight there is no way you can give Jones the majority of the rounds. And saying he was robbed... That goes to show which incredible dimensions most things about Ali get. This is a pure example of the defintion close but clear win IMO.
It certainly wasn't a dominating perfomance by Ali after watching the tapes and it's not out of the ordinary to believe this decision was handed to him. Ali started a lot of the exchanges in the fight, but Douj Jones finished them.
In some places it's not out of the ordinary not to believe in evolution, but it's still stupid. Why would it "be handed to him"? No, it wasn't a dominant perfomance by any means, but a robbery...? For me, that's just silly.
funny, i was reading angelo dundee's book earlier this week and he was talking about the doug jones fight. apparently, angelo was receiveing a lot of flak from guys at the gym about young clay not keeping his hands up, and this is what he did: "So i told him to "keep his hand up" before the fight. So, while he was keeping his "hands up" out there, he was also getting the hell kicked out of him. I had fooled around with his style and was wrong to do so. He came back to me after the third round and i told him the opposite, "Keep your hands down". And it worked." not saying its an excuse why clay looked bad, just throwing it out there. i did not watch the fight btw. as for the topic, as many here already said i too feel that young clay's workrate/stamina, speed and reflexes would have eventually allowed him to beat the older, more experienced version of himself, by a decision after a grueling 15 round war.
64, though it will be a tough fight, 74 Ali beats almost anyone in history so tough call. But I will take his youth and better speed over experience and ring savvy.
Yes,Jones seemed to go downhill as quickly as Jimmy Young did some years later. Mind you,even if Jones had retained his 1963 form,the Ali of 1965/67 would have beaten him more convincingly than previously. In the interim 2/3 years,Jones had peaked,and Ali had matured.
superior footwork wins this and a young clay wouldn't fall for that rope-a-dope when 74 ali realizes he can't catch him and has to change tactics. clay stood and fought against jones early but as soon as he started using more footwork/movement he was winning.
Older Ali was stronger, smarter , younger Ali was more on his toes...I think the older version makes the younger version fight his fight for a SD
This is how I envisage it. The Clay of '64 was still some way off the best ever Ali that we ever saw,which was 1967.
:good As close as the fight was,Ali won it. No doubt in my mind. I truly believe that the baptisms of fire that Ali received in this fight,actually helped him when it came to the first Liston fight. Plus the psychological boosts that he received in recovering well from the Banks and Cooper knockdowns. He KNEW that he could take a shot,just as well as he could evade one.
The 1967 incarnation of Ali would storm the press conference and shout ouy "I'll fight both of these men on the same night"
Probably. Folley was stylewise quite similar to Jones and Ali handled him in a very smart manner, I'd say. He'd probably do something similar to Jones. But it would have been very interesting to see, because it would show in just what ways Ali evolved during these years.