Cassius Clay vs FOTC Frazier

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by emallini, Nov 9, 2015.


  1. emallini

    emallini Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,274
    2,538
    Mar 16, 2008
    Clay from the Liston fights vs Frazier from the fight of the century. Who wins?
     
  2. YesMySon

    YesMySon Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,997
    13
    Aug 12, 2015
    I'm gonna say clay
     
  3. Phil_Ivey_76

    Phil_Ivey_76 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,823
    175
    Aug 26, 2013
  4. ribtickler68

    ribtickler68 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,985
    131
    Apr 27, 2013
  5. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,553
    Jul 28, 2004
    Frazier...Cassius Clay didn't have the strength and savvy of the mature Ali to adequately deal with FOTC Frazier.
     
  6. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,576
    Nov 24, 2005
    Probably Frazier.
    I think the Ali of late '66 and early '67 (just before he stopped fighting due to that army draft thing) would have beaten Frazier though.
     
  7. RockyJim

    RockyJim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,237
    2,430
    Mar 26, 2005
  8. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,048
    25,122
    Jan 3, 2007
    As it stands, Muhammad Ali gave Joe a great fight the first time around then beat him in their next two meetings. It only stands to reason with me that without the layoff he only does better. I've never bought into the notion that the 70's saw a vastly improved and gracefully mature version of Ali. What I see on film is a guy who holds behind the neck, leans on the ropes and using various tactics to conserve energy as a result of lost ability. In the 60's, Ali was noticeably quicker and more importantly could keep up that speed and tempo for 15 rounds.
     
  9. Vince Voltage

    Vince Voltage Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,076
    1,296
    Jan 1, 2011
    Frazier. The young clay was less secure on his feet, had less upper body strength. Frazier would have out-slugged him.
     
  10. bbjc

    bbjc Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,887
    4,778
    Feb 25, 2012
    Mental talk. Cassuis would have won it. Was a far better fighter pre lay off. He slowed down a good bit after it.
     
  11. Nighttrain

    Nighttrain 'BOUT IT 'BOUT IT Full Member

    5,292
    977
    Nov 7, 2011
    Smokin' Joe, Clay lacked Ali's strength and firepower.
     
  12. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    Clay with consummate ease, Joe would be hitting nothing. To quote Clay from around that time.

    " Your hands can't hit what your eyes can't see "
     
  13. Pugilist_Spec

    Pugilist_Spec Hands Of Stone Full Member

    4,937
    786
    Aug 17, 2015
    Any version of Ali loses to FOTC Frazier.
     
  14. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Any version of Ali would have been given hell. The reason being, he would underestimate Frazier first time around. He wouldn't know what Frazier would bring until he was in the ring with him, then it would be too late. Although saying that, Ali wasn't the greatest at figuring a fighter out in rematches.
     
  15. FastHands(beeb)

    FastHands(beeb) Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,496
    407
    Oct 28, 2010
    Frazier for the reasons mentioned above, plus he definitely had 15 hard rounds in his tank...we don't know if 1964 Clay had that...

    I've always felt it significant that of Clay/Ali's 4 main rivals (Liston, Frazier, Norton & Foreman) the 2 he had the most trouble with, Frazier & Norton could do 15 hard rounds, whereas the 2 he beat more convincingly, Liston & Foreman, appeared to have significant stamina issues.

    Not a coincidence, imo.