Catchweights- good or bad for boxing?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Super Hans, Apr 14, 2015.


  1. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super Oneā„¢ banned

    48,579
    87
    Apr 18, 2013
    Catchweights- good or bad for boxing?
     
  2. Ducklerr

    Ducklerr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,815
    1,908
    Apr 1, 2015
    I don't mind them if it's the only way to make a megafight. Otherwise, not a fan.
     
  3. Golden Boy 360

    Golden Boy 360 Boxing's Biggest Cash Cow Full Member

    11,452
    11
    Mar 14, 2009
    I don't like them because after you get excuses like "he was weight drained" (which can't really be proven)
     
  4. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    72,975
    39,407
    Sep 29, 2012
    100% bad if any sort of title is involved. I'm not 100% against them, but in recent years they've been **** and a waste of time...
     
  5. shaneacedera

    shaneacedera New Member Full Member

    78
    0
    Apr 11, 2015
    they should add a catchweight champion out there.
     
  6. Beouche

    Beouche Juan Manuel Marquez Full Member

    23,723
    4,042
    Oct 13, 2010

    Manny's been the Catchweight Queen for years
     
  7. Beouche

    Beouche Juan Manuel Marquez Full Member

    23,723
    4,042
    Oct 13, 2010
    They're a disgrace

    Back in the olden days there were far fewer weight classes than there are today

    The greats of the past would be turning in their graves
     
  8. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,102
    7,683
    Sep 2, 2011
    They're not bad but I don't like them, I believe in the official weight classes.
     
  9. Moanamchara

    Moanamchara Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,446
    154
    Dec 11, 2010
    Using weight to weaken an opponent to give you an advantage is absurd. It taints the fight.
     
  10. Leoh

    Leoh Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,749
    1,239
    Dec 19, 2014
    What's the significance of traditional weight limits anyway. All limits serve the same purpose.
     
  11. LordSouness

    LordSouness Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,195
    691
    Feb 15, 2014
    It makes no difference.

    The weights in boxing are already pretty arbitrary anyway - what difference does it make if both fighters fight at 150 or 154? The rules are the same and the conditions are the same.

    People can complain about it giving an opponent an advantage - but how is that any different to asking someone to come up and fight you at 147 instead of 140? Does that mean the weight system is to blame in that case too?

    The circumstances don't change.
     
  12. aaalbert

    aaalbert Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,041
    2,023
    Jan 15, 2015
    Meh, I'm pretty indifferent.

    They're really only hurting themselves I think.
    Better without but doesn't matter awhole lot.
     
  13. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,150
    5,699
    Oct 5, 2009
    On one hand I hate titles being decided on them but on the other these guys signed the contract, they knew what they got themselves into though I guess fighters do anything for the big money fight

    I didn't like Pac vs Cotto since Pac fought at welter already plus for a belt

    Floyd vs Canelo, how come it was ok to fight Oscar at 154 but not Canelo

    Catch weights are ok if Ward wants to fight Huck. Ward never fought at cruiser and Huck never fought at lhwt. Catch weights make zero sense between 2 guys at the same class unless it's above their usual weight like Garcia vs Petersen
     
  14. ValentinePrince

    ValentinePrince Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,869
    32
    Nov 21, 2013
    They're fine when they concern fighters of differing divisions, but they shouldn't be allowed in title fights. Certainly not in lineal title fights.

    I remember she there was talk of their being a 156lb CW fight by Bradley and Cotto for middleweight lineal ship. Um, no.
     
  15. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    The notion that they make fights possible that otherwise wouldn't happen rings pretty false to me. More often they merely make it possible for the bigger draw to use his leverage for an advantage in the ring.