Cazaghe better than Floyd?

atsch:rofl:rofl

 

He did what any great fighter should do. He gave him an IMMEDIATE rematch and put all rumors to rest.

Say what you want about a close decision. If a guy gives the rematch and wins it even more convincingly the issue is settled.

 

that all you took from that? or maybe you need some more time.
yeah he arguably lost that fight but you will agree that arguably losing to jose luis castillo is better then arguably losing to robin reid right?:think

 

arguably losing to jose luis castillo is better than ARGUABLY winning against robin reid

Not to mention Floyd gave a rematch what bout Slappy

 

:deal

 

well, what about hatton and corrales, who beat castillo. who on calzaghe resume can compare to those fighters besides hopkins, who you've mentioned already?

 

Would JC beat the Roy Jones that tarnished James Toney's great SMW run in the 90's?

Would Joe beat the Hopkins that made Trinidad his lil beotch?

Would he have beaten the Eubank that TKO'd Nigel Benn in 90?

See the same could be said for your sorry fighter and as you see the time difference between these fighters prime and when they fought Joe is worse than your example with Floyd.

 

Joe aint fightin in actual time.

 

hatton was at 147, agreed but he was still in his PRIME. can you say the same about eubank? and hatton stuggled at 147 because the opponets were too big for him. collazo was a full fledged welterweight. mayweather isnt. mayweather is, more or less, hatton's own size. a bout at 140 would have rendered the same result.

both and undefeated corrales and an undefeated kessler are about the same. you're right but, judging their enitre careers, you have to give the edge to corrales.

Corrales best wins are against casamayor, castillo, and frietas.
what are kessler's best wins? andrade? beyer? mundine?
you really want to compare their best wins?

 

I really hate Floyd but Joe C aint better then him.