chad dawson calls out bhop but never calls out other young top guys???why

Living off the Ademek win?

WHy are these guys bringing up titles like they mean JACK ****. Dawson is the top guy, those titles were stripped from him and handed to lesser fighters b.c of POLITICS, b/c of the title BULL**** that is ruining the sport.

You think just b/c they have a title and dawson doesnt that Dawson ISNT the top guy and HAS NOT proven so?

Get the **** out of here.

 

Adamek WHO IS A BEAST NOW HAS HIS ONE AND ONLY LOSS TO CHAD...THAT IN ITSELF IS A DAMN BIG WIN...WINS OVER TARVER WASN'T BAD IN BUILDING A NAME AND GLEN JOHNSON IS STILL PRETTY DAMN GOOD AND HE BEAT HIM TWICE AND THE SECOND TIME VERY CONVINCINGLY....THE GUYS YOU TALKIN BOUT NEEDA GET ON HIS LEVEL AND OFFER THE MONEY HE COULD BE MAKING WITH THE OTHER GUYS IF THEIR SO GOOD....:deal

 

because that fight would give him a famous boxer for his record, media and fanfare attention he has never gotten before and the highest cash payment for any fight he's had.. and he could probably win it.

 

Do you mean that there should be no mandatories and everybody who won
the title may fight whoever he wants as long as there is good money for him, right?

So the best options for Chad now would be if he beat Hopkins and then Jones Jr ...
and in the final stage of his career he will get in the ring Michalczewski and Ottke
live in Germany, then he may retire as the best LHW in the history.

 

he wants bhop at 175 cus he feels bhop is the man to beat.i say let bhop fight jones jr and retire.if jones would have won against danny green the belt at cruiser would have been on the line.

 

because he is the top guy in his division. would pacquiao call out fighter like cintron and berto? not a chance. you only call out fighters on your level or higher. calling out weaker fighters is called cherry-picking

 

or peaking these who are older and weaker but more marketable
on TV instead these who are younger, hungrier and in mandatory position

 

No one has any reason to give a **** about mandatories.

I'd agree if Dawson were calling out Roy Jones, but your man Hopkins is the one who's picking on a disabled fighter.

Hopkins puts his fights on PPV and technically is one of the top guys in the division, so calling him out is the right thing to do.

And to the original poster, Dawson is going to fight Pascal and would have fought Cloud had Cloud's people not turned down the opportunity.

 

you think any of those mandatories is better than hopkins? you have to de kidding. dawson knows that hopkins is marketable but he also knows he'll be a tought fight for him.

**** madatories. fighters should always fight who they think will challenge them the most. not because some fighter slept with some *** from the abc organizations.

 

Posters who say **** the maditories show there ignorance in Boxing Knowledge.
Withuot Manditories Chad Dawson wouldn't even have gotten a chance to fight for a world title. **** off trolls and keyboard warriors

 

dawson is one mandatory challenger who actually deserved the title shot. can you name any others? then compare that to the madatories who were clearly nowhere near the level of the champions.

then count the champions who have been stripped of their championships theyr rightfully own. because they refure to allow abc organizations to dictate to them to fight a weak ass opponent that will do nothing to advance the champ's career.

going back to dawson, wasnt he stripped of a title because he refuse to fight a weak madatory? even you example for your arguement thinks that mandatories are ****ed. he vacated his ibf title because they were forcing him to fight a mandatory when he wanted to fight johnson because many boxing fans thought johnson won the first match.

 

Money

 

Yet there he is fighting Clottey...