Chad Dawson is NOT a top 10 light heavyweight

the thread originator is obviously joking. wasn't referring to you. actually didn't see any of your posts until just now.

 

why do you think the thread starter is joking?

 

trollpower headbanger. lol troll on

 

read the original post. if you're not laughing out loud by the time you're finished reading the people he's supposed to fight before he becomes a "top 10 LHW" in the eyes of this guy, then i suppose you could think he's not joking.

 

how many of those boxers have you watched in action before?

 

i'm no troll, i never lose a debate and i back up what i say with facts.

do you agree auracle, if not, why not?

 

whatever you say homie

 

i have not. however, why would somebody who's worked his way to the top after a long while have to beat somebody who's 8-0 or 5-0 before being considered top 10? don't you think it's the 5-0 guy's job to work his way up? regardless of his name or where he comes from. dude has fought 5 times in the pros while chad has beaten tarver, johnson, adamek, etc. c'mon.

 

where did your vcash go? did you take a big gamble on jones to beat hopkins or cotto to beat pacman etc?

the only prediction i've got wrong on esb is that i tipped jones to upset hopkins in their 2nd fight.

 

dont matter. do you and i shall do me

 

I think you have to be more subtle with your trolling.

 

:finger5