Chad Dawson is NOT a top 10 light heavyweight

once again you have disgraced the forum, mocking the handicapped in an attempt to be humourous :nono

is there no level that you and your disgraceful vcash total won't stoop too?:-(

the thread starter has made several good points in this thread that deserve to be discussed, yet you continue to spam it up with crude remarks about handicapped people :-(

 

Sure he is a top 10 light-heavyweight. Actually, he is my first choice at this moment. The old craftsman Glen Johnson schooled him in their first fight. In the second, however, Dawson was much better.

I would not mind seeing a rematch with Adamek at some point. It would be hard for them to meet at a suitable weight though.

 

He should fight Dawid Kostecki (34-1)

 

Not when Tarver was #1 though. Now whos deluded? Dawson fought Tarver after he had lost to Johnson and Hopkins not before, so fought Tarver when he couldnt have been any higher than #2, years later. Hopkins was #1 at that time, therefore he is not #1, thanks

 

Did you or did you not say he was number 1 in your post before ?
you did , dawson , tarver , johnson , hopkins OWN whats his name from hungary
& tavoris cloud KTFO the no name entity

 

Yep but Tarver wasnt #1 when Dawson beat him. Hopkins was, understand ratings change otherwise Tarver would stil be #1. Dawson wasnt even rated when Tarver was #1.

I can understand you trying to alter the truth to help your arguement, either that or your not able to read what was written so ill try again for you, so you understand.

Jones jnr was at HW, Tarver was #1 LHW, Gonzalez #2. Erdei beat Gonzalez. A while later Tarver split some fights with Johnson and after beating Jones, then Hopkins beat Tarver to be champ, Calzaghe beat Hopkins so Calzaghe was champ at LHW and Hopkins #1. Tarver was 2 or 3 at the time not #1 when Dawson beat him, so Erdei fought a fighter rated as high as Dawson highest rated victory years earlier.

Does that make sense to you now? If not dont talk to me about being deluded because they are facts

 

Regardless of alphabet ratings you clearly take as gospel truth , you actually think whats his name could beat a shot to death tarver (2010 version) , glen johnson & chad dawson , if so your bias is blinding your judgement so bad it's untrue

 

What? Are you ****ing sick? This is the bad chad who beat adamek. Future pfp #1 fighter and he is not a top 10 light heavyweight? some of you guys man....

 

There ****ing idiots man!

 

Not guessing any results because alot of fighters get hyped before they have fought the best, just looking at factual results.
Erdei soundly beat Gonzalez who beat a younger version of Johnson who split a pair of fights with Tarver, and looked by some to be unlucky against Dawson first time round. These are factual results
If Tarver is so shot to death as you put it, you must be basing those thoughts on his last 2 fights against Dawson, so why do you then credit it as big wins for Dawson? If you think that why argue Tarver at #1, why in the next breath do you say hes shot? Dawson is 14/15 years younger than Tarver and Johnson, and yet struggled with Johnson, yet Erdei soundly beat a guy that beat a version of Johnson 7 years more youthful than Johnson the first time Dawson fought him. Facts
Erdei the #1 LHW

 

I think Dawson is a top 10 LHW, but below Erdei

 

Like i said if you look again and care to read a shot tarver 2010 version care to look again ? and where would you put this bloke from hungary he's such a non entity a dont type his name , where does he rank on your P4P list ? & is he the greatest LHW you seen to love him a canny bit , look why doesnt he go to america and beat the LHW or even campillo or shumenov thats a start , yeah there **** but there ranked and are/were title holders