Chad Dawson vs Mikkel Kessler @ 168lbs

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Danny_Rand, May 10, 2009.


  1. the-demon

    the-demon Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,852
    0
    Jul 26, 2008
    more like runners.:lol::lol::lol:
     
  2. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    If you call defense and not catching punches with your face then yeah. Runners. :rofl
     
  3. LiamE

    LiamE Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,391
    3
    Nov 3, 2007
    Christ on a pogo stick Danny are you still flogging your stupidty for everyone to marvel at?

    Chad is proven 175 fighter, Kessler a proven 168 fighter. It is very possible Chad would be drained coming down to 168 whether he says he can do it or not, hence the voting.

    Now get over it.
     
  4. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    JEsus, not this dumb****

    The voting at the time this poll was taken was when Dawson was considering the move down. His team had just called Kessler out.

    And Kessler isnt proven at 168. Again, weak resume. Dawson, conversly, strong resume.
     
  5. Jepster

    Jepster Almost Audleysome Full Member

    3,558
    2
    Apr 25, 2007
    What the **** are you talking about?? Kessler is the most proven in the 168 division. Tell me who is more proven than him.

    He has been universally recognised as the man at 168 since Calzaghe retired.
     
  6. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    Froch's beaten Taylor and Dirrell. Better fighters then anyone on Kesslers resume. WHo has Kessler beaten ***? Mundine. Andrade?:lol::lol:

    On default. HE won a vacant belt from a German journeymen. So the **** what. :rofl Whoo!

    dumbass.
     
  7. Kid Cuba

    Kid Cuba Boxing Junkie banned

    7,712
    0
    Feb 16, 2009
  8. Jepster

    Jepster Almost Audleysome Full Member

    3,558
    2
    Apr 25, 2007
    You're so ****ing weak it's hillarious. Taylor is a shadow of himself at 168. Kessler has the best resume out of all 168 pounders period.
    You might not recognise Kessler's wins over Siaca, Beyer, Mundine or Andrade.
    That only goes to show that you know nothing about boxing.
     
  9. Jepster

    Jepster Almost Audleysome Full Member

    3,558
    2
    Apr 25, 2007
    What the **** are you talking about??

    He's from Kasakhstan you moron...

    And that would be the second time he won the wba strap. Before fighting Calzaghe he held the wbc and the wba strap fyi...
     
  10. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    :bbb
    A shadow of Taylor is better then ****ing Mundine Andrade:lol: Dirrell would school everyone on Kesslers resume, 4 years ago

    !
    Omg! Not Siaca and Beyer! Hofers right there. :rofl Mundine?! Gosh. Is that the guy with like 5 losses and fights Australian cabbies now? What a legend!

    Clown.
     
  11. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    Dimitri Sartisan idiot. YOu know the guy whos opponents have nearly the same losses as wins.

    Is that the standard in Europe these days? Winning vacant belts from cabbies
     
  12. Jepster

    Jepster Almost Audleysome Full Member

    3,558
    2
    Apr 25, 2007
    Keep digging your own grave. All of those fighters were top ten in the ring rankings at the time Kessler fought them...

    Dirrel is a good fighter, but nowhere near the level of Kessler.
     
  13. LiamE

    LiamE Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,391
    3
    Nov 3, 2007
    This content is protected
     
  14. Jepster

    Jepster Almost Audleysome Full Member

    3,558
    2
    Apr 25, 2007
    Yeah that's standard in Europe. We do it all the time... Now if you'll excuse me I have to go win a vacant belt of a cabbie :patsch
     
  15. Jepster

    Jepster Almost Audleysome Full Member

    3,558
    2
    Apr 25, 2007
    Wish the mods would ban these ****ers. They are so ****ing annoying.