chad dawson vs. mikkel kessler , 170 catchweight , who wins ?

hahahaha watching rudyard and franken remind me of when i had my first beer too,oh the days of yore! 'siaca and woods' lol

 

Like I said, if Kessler wanted to avoid Miranda he had a readymade excuse - Miranda wasn't ranked by the WBA and was therefore not eligable to fight for the title.

There's no calculated risk, because what is the reward? The only possible reason for Kessler's camp to try to make a fight against Miranda is the obvious one - they wanted to fight him.

This is utter unsupported and completely illogical bull**** that you are spouting now.

 

It's the worst conspiracy theory ever.

Facts: Kessler tried to make a fight against Miranda for the WBA title when there was absolutely no compulsion on him to do so.

Conclusion: He must have been trying to avoid Miranda atsch

 

This is just getting plain silly... I am not going down to that level of debating. Please have fun in here posting...

 

What part of my last post didnt you understand...you can try to force your so called " ACUTAL FACTS" all you want to but I'll still take the wordds of a guy that acutally has insight of the situation than a guy that post on a web site.( yes, you!)

You keep saying that I dont know what I'm talking about but apparently I must have some insight for me to pull up the article.:rofl I love how you try to play the Mr. KNOW IT ALL role! The fact still reamians that Kessler turned down a bout with the rugged Miranda...Thats a fact so deal with it...your boy Kessler is overrated!

 

**** me, you actually don't read what you're replying to, do you?

One more time: I posted you a complete and accurate timeline of what happened. There were two fights proposed between Miranda and Kessler, in two seperate locations, backed by two different tv companies, the second for a title, the first not. Kessler pulled out of the first, for his own reasons, Miranda turned down the second, for his own reasons.

The reason that the article you posted doesn't mention the second is that it was written before the second fight had been proposed.

Is it really this hard?

By the way, can you confirm who wrote the article you posted? You know, the guy with the 'insight into the situation'. Just interested, like.

 

We know he wanted to fight him. There was no other possible motive to offer him a fight than because he wanted to fight him. Even you can't suggest a possible one that makes sense.