Chambers is NOT GOOD. Povetkin BAD. This is how to beat KLITSCHKO as a smaller man.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by HENDO, Mar 24, 2010.


  1. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,098
    Jul 19, 2004
    No as good or as big as Valouev.
     
  2. maverock

    maverock Active Member Full Member

    738
    2
    Mar 4, 2010
    Tucker compared to Wlad? Carnera compared to Wlad? LOL

    What a load of BS.
     
  3. guncho

    guncho next champion! Full Member

    4,966
    515
    Oct 15, 2007
    sad thing is you actully believe that!
     
  4. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    Why are people denying what they see with their eyes.

    They say Carnera is clumsy.

    Carnera had a REAL opponent in front of him, and made him appear to look clumsy.

    Klitschko looked CLUMSY as HELL in the 12th round going for the KO against Chambers.

    I have EYES. I believe what I see.

    I don't see Klitschko moving any more fluid or faster than Carnera.
     
  5. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    Carnera is nothing like Valuev.

    Valuev has a huge body and short arms. He fights standing straight up and has no style.

    Klitschko looks like a mirror image of Carnera. Same stance. Same build. Same way they hold their hands, throw their punches, etc.
     
  6. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    If Carnera was so slow, why when I play the tape does he move at an equal speed as Klitschko.

    Play both at the same time.

    Who are you lying to?
     
  7. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    But the fact is you can see him on film and compare the two face to face.

    While there are breaks in the old film of course where you don't see all the footage, it's still in real time.

    And Carnera is moving just as fast as Klitschko.
     
  8. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    Wlad doesn't have the aresnal that Tucker did. You ever seen Wlad throw an uppercut?

    Tucker rocked the **** out of Mike Tyson with one.
     
  9. maverock

    maverock Active Member Full Member

    738
    2
    Mar 4, 2010
    FAIL. You really should stop commenting on boxing. Wrong sport for you.
     
  10. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    A) Mother ****er, I ain't new. I just banned the **** out of.

    B) You don't know **** about boxin

    C) I can SEE FILM. I got eyes. Play em at the same time. I ain't an appolgist or a blind mother ****er.

    I know what the **** is goin on.

    Mother ****er is a replica. He just don't have no Joe Louis's or Max Bear's around to knock him the **** out.

    But hey, Corrie part time Sanders knocked his ass out and that mother ****er stands straight up and makes all kinds of technical mistakes.
     
  11. maverock

    maverock Active Member Full Member

    738
    2
    Mar 4, 2010
    You sound like you have mental problems. Go seek some help. Boxing ain't for you.
     
  12. steele311

    steele311 Wanna Dance? Full Member

    2,248
    0
    Jan 29, 2009
    Chambers is no Louis. Carnera was no Wlad. I don't get it.
     
  13. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    You're damn right Chambers is no Louis, but Wlad is about as close to Carnera as any fighter I've ever seen.

    But the point is, while Chambers is in fact no Louis, he utilized the wrong strategy to beat Wlad.
     
  14. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    86
    May 30, 2009
    While Wlad is better than Carnera. His offensive arsenal and power is a bit more destructive. Carnera could probably take a better beating though (Check the Louis and Baer fights. No way Wlad takes that). Either way, Louis would beat both Klits. Dare I say destroy them.

    Wlad also obviously manages distant better than Carnera is a bit more skilled and technical. Wlad is much better, but he's not in some other realm. It's hard to assess considering the two guys opposition.
     
  15. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    I agree that Wlad fights more cautiously because it is more acceptable in this era, but considering the level of his opposition it's hard to determine whether he judges distance better because nobody moves their head today and attempts to make him miss.

    Also, on the inside Klitschko's aresnal is nullified.