Chambers is NOT GOOD. Povetkin BAD. This is how to beat KLITSCHKO as a smaller man.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by HENDO, Mar 24, 2010.


  1. maverock

    maverock Active Member Full Member

    738
    2
    Mar 4, 2010
    They all move their head until they get hit. Then they quickly forget about their strategy and gameplan.
     
  2. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    Didn't I already tell you that you don't know boxing.

    Learn some **** first about the sport before you get in a grown up conversation.
     
  3. Terror

    Terror free smoke Full Member

    3,251
    1,664
    Mar 22, 2010
    Klitschko and Carnera are not analogous.

    Eddie Chambers and JOE LOUIS are not analogous.

    Novel thought to start with, but ultimately stupid.
     
  4. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    Yeah because Eddie Chambers is Joe Louis is the title of the thread.

    And Klitschko and Carnera are the same type of fighter.
     
  5. maverock

    maverock Active Member Full Member

    738
    2
    Mar 4, 2010
    It was _YOU_ who started this incredibly ridiculous thread. You know jack**** about boxing, this thread is living proof.

    Why didn't you clown make this thread before Chambers got his head handed to him on a plate? Why after the fight? I bet you were one of those guys hyping Chambers to the sky before the fight.. "CHAMBERS WILL TAKE WLAD APART". And then after the fight you get a new nickname and post threads with "CHAMBERS SUCKS".

    You should be ashamed of yourself.
     
  6. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    5
    Dec 5, 2006
    Yes it would take a Joe Louis or Mike Tyson as a smaller fighter to beat Kitschko something we are seriously lacking in the heavyweight division today.

    No Wlad does not fight like Carnera.
     
  7. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    If Wlad doesn't fight like Carnera, then why when I play both of them at the same time do they look identical?

    Why don't you try convicning me that the sky ain't blue too.

    And it doesn't necessarily take a smaller heavy to beat Klitschko. A of equal size or bigger can beat him too, albiet with a different strategy.

    See Corrie Sanders.
     
  8. maverock

    maverock Active Member Full Member

    738
    2
    Mar 4, 2010
    Maybe it's those pills you take.
     
  9. Doc (aka Meke)

    Doc (aka Meke) Active Member Full Member

    1,369
    5
    Oct 19, 2007
    Dude, Sanders gave weight and height on Wlad, just like most of other guys...

    of course, WK has no inside game... he doesn't freaking need it! He clinches...that's his inside game...which is fair given that he is not a midget you probably are, and can imitate Chavez, Pacman and other vicious infighters.

    But WK is fast, very fast with fist, and even faster on feet. Comparing him with Tucker is just ridiculous... I don't think there has ever been a HW of his size with both hand and foot speed (even LL is probably behind in both).
     
  10. GoldenArms

    GoldenArms Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,326
    242
    Jan 24, 2009
  11. Doc (aka Meke)

    Doc (aka Meke) Active Member Full Member

    1,369
    5
    Oct 19, 2007
    it's either WK is that good or his opposition is that bad that can explain his utter dominance. yes, those guys in Chagaev and Chambers (just to take two recent examples) are no Tyson and Louis... but to insinuate that WK is like Primo Carerra, is even more ridiculous than to compare Chaggy and Chamby to Tyson and Louis.

    Chagaev, Povetkin and Chambers are world class fighters, the best among the best currently. Some of them were world amateur champs, some won gold Olympic medals...and yet none of them will be able (or were not) to lay a glove on WK. If that freaks you out to scream they are completely rubbish so be it. You are not the only one who is freaked out...when there was such a dominant champ who would not even get hit, let alone lose a round in the history of boxing? I know, it's such a sad era... my ass
     
  12. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    You're right, he doesn't need it now because nobody knows how to get inside and fight.

    He would need it against Tyson though. Or he would lose a decision and most likely get knocked out.
     
  13. the_brigand

    the_brigand I'll Eat Her Later... Full Member

    3,906
    0
    Oct 2, 2008
    it's quite likely that the Louis - Carnera fight was filmed at a older slower 16 or 18 FPS format, so when it was up-converted to 24FPS it had the effect of making it appear nearly twice as fast.
     
  14. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    I never said Wlad was a bad fighter. Carnera isn't a bad fighter and given the level of competition in this era, Carnera would be champ too if he were to take Wlad's place.

    But Chambers, Povetkin, and Chagaev are jokes. You can look at the film to tell you that.

    Don't lie to yourself. Povetkin is one of the worst prospects I've ever seen

    He stands straight up, doesn't move his head, stands right in front of you, has very little mobility, goes foward in straight lines and lacks power.

    What is special about Povetkin?

    Audley Harrison won the gold too.
     
  15. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    You don't think I already realize that when you can't see their arms punching that it's not that they're so fast you can't see them punch, but it's the format?

    I look at where they were, and where they are.

    I'm not a ****in idiot.

    Why do people make all these excuses?

    Damn......I don't have an agenda.