Champions who would never have been Champion if there were only one belt

Amir Khan

 

My god there is too many to name. I was getting ready to at least list the current champs that would have never made it and even that is too many for me to be bothered, let alone all time.

 

Give the guy a break, he's 22 ffs.

 

just looking at the champs at the min u could argue that nicolay valuev, giaccobe fragomeni,guilermo jones, marco huck, carl froch, robert stielglitz, lucian bute, felix sterm, sebastian sylvester, daniel santos, cory spinks, andre berto, issac hlatchwayo, devon alexander, amir khan, jean pascal, gabriel campillo, tavoris cloud, zsolt erdei, edwin valero, humberto soto, juan carlos salgado, elio rojas, cristobal cruz, steve luevano, juan manuel lopez, toshiaki nishioka, anselmo morena, fernando montiel, simphiwe nonggayi, marvin sonsona and a few more would not have been champions yet and that is just a list out of current champions excluding the last six months, last year, last decade, last 40 year - you could probably list over a thousand boxers

 

Pac

 

That might be the stupidest post I have ever read.

 

edwin valero

 

Relax, I was only kidding

 

Pac at lightweight

 

bernard dunne

 

junior witter
paulie malignaggi
paulus moses???
pinklon thomas
terry marsh
jeff lacey

 

First name I thought of before opening the thread. . . John Ruiz.

 

There's 4 belts instead of 1. Mathematically, that means that 3/4 of all titlists probably wouldn't be one without multiple belts. This thread could go on forever.

 

Very true! It is also true that you could turn this thread inside out by bringing up a scenario like the following:

There was a brief period in 1976 when Alexis Arguello was the WBA champ at 126, and Danny "Little Red" Lopez was the WBC champ: Which guy wasn't a champion?

There are many such instances in history.