Change boxing forever

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Utter1, Aug 13, 2008.


  1. Utter1

    Utter1 Active Member Full Member

    978
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    Hi guys, in keeping with how modern sports continue to evolve with different rules and criterias etc......i think a huge change in boxing could well be needed.

    With MMA evolving at a rapid rate and competing with boxing for ratings..one change i could think of that could have a huge impact on matchmaking and excitement is to change the weight limit in each division. Of course this could only be done in a meeting between the main 4 sanctioning bodies and national assoications. With human beings generally heavier a few name changes to certain division would have to apply. Also whilst some division could lose there steep history...we must remember that history should not stop us progressing.

    This is an example i had in mind and with a possible top 10 list to boot.

    Featherweight 130-

    Lightweight 140-
    Hatton
    Pacquaio
    Holt
    Bradley
    Campbell
    Casayamour
    Diaz

    Welterweight 160-
    K. Pavlik
    Abraham
    O. De La Hoya
    Margarito
    Mosley
    Cotto
    Cintron
    Clotty
    P. Willaims
    c. Spinks

    Middlweight 185-
    Calzaghe
    Hopkins,
    Dawson
    Taylor
    Lacy
    Froch
    L. Bute
    Roy Jones

    Light-Heavyweight 210-
    Haye
    Macrenelli
    Chambers

    Heavyweight 210+


    I must go as my boss is coming but basically if anyone wants to fill out the possible top 10 in each division it would be welcomed.....the main thing is the possible top matches between individuals.......and it would help improve boxing as boxers themselves cant nitpick.
     
  2. ESAJZ

    ESAJZ Member Full Member

    124
    0
    Feb 17, 2006
    I definitely agree that fewer weight classes would be a huge benefit to boxing. It would definitely cut down on confusion for casual fans. Also, talent-depth in each division would be much deeper since there would simply be more fighters.

    Sadly, I don't know how we would get the sanctioning bodies to agree to this. Brainstorm time!
     
  3. FlatNose

    FlatNose Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,800
    25
    Feb 16, 2006
    It'll never happen. The money making possibilities of several champions in needless weight classes is too great. More champs, more money. It's actually good for the boxers. Even mediocrities can win belts and make dough. Don King , Bob Arum , and Golden Douche would all go broke with only 8 weight divisions and one champ per weight class.
     
  4. Loewe

    Loewe internet hero Full Member

    5,479
    12
    Jul 15, 2008
    Just go back to the original 8 weightclasses and get rid of the ABCs and everything would be fine.
     
  5. Vantage_West

    Vantage_West ヒップホップ·プロデューサー Full Member

    20,761
    532
    Jul 11, 2006
    i have no problem with the other wieght divisions. it's just the amount of world titles that confuse everything.

    ibo wbc iba ibf wbu wbo wba ibc nba wbf ring....undistpued lineal p4p amatuer. for god sake my mate said to me is amir khan not fighting in the olympics then:patsch


    light middle, super middle, light welter, light fly, cruiser, jnr bantam i have no problems with. they all have great champions in them and to throw them away would bew a bad move.

    could you expect terry norris fight at middlewieght :think
     
  6. Florida boy

    Florida boy Bodacious Full Member

    1,078
    0
    Oct 3, 2007
    15 round fights, less money for fighters(like the ufc, that way guys fight more to make more money rather then hold out and cherry pick), less early stoppages. less joe cortez.
     
  7. standing 8

    standing 8 Active Member Full Member

    1,396
    0
    Sep 9, 2007

    I disagree, if any thing boxers in general should make more money, right now only the top 10% see any real dough.