Changed Title

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ROACH, Jan 13, 2013.


Page 1 of 2
  1. ROACH

    ROACH Boxing Addict banned

    3,130
    1
    Sep 27, 2012
    dealt with, that ****in idiot must be gettin pounded in the ass by Lomanchenko.

    I knew he was a *****. He said Lomenchenko would beat Broner right now.

    Now, if you haven't seen Lomanchenko, he has solid amateur credentials, but he doesn't have exceptional athleticsm. Right now, he's an undercard fighter at best.

    And to be honest, while he has solid fundamentals, he doesn't have awe inspiring power and speed like Pacquaio nor does have phenomenal reflexes like Whitaker.

    This is important because as a 5'7'' lightweight, he shouldn't have any issues because he's solid for the size, but if he make it up to welterweight, normal guys could give him problems because he'll have technique, but he won't have that special attribute that will seperate him from the rest of the pack.

    Think historically, there are very few undersized southpaws in the history of the sport that have a great deal of success.

    Look at the guys in today that do have success. Martinez often goes against bigger men, but he has phenomenal athleticism, speed and power. Pacquaio is on the same boat.

    Perhaps Lomenchenko does have this, but him beating Broner at this point.

    Only a guy gettin ****ed in the ass by him would say that ****.

    So in conclusion, if this was a scientific paper, dealt with is a homosexual.

    And that's the word.

    Thoughts?
     
    ROACH, Jan 13, 2013
    ROACH, Jan 13, 2013
    #1
  2. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    Aren't there moderators to clean up this sort of garbage?
     
    dealt_with, Jan 13, 2013
    dealt_with, Jan 13, 2013
    #2
  3. ROACH

    ROACH Boxing Addict banned

    3,130
    1
    Sep 27, 2012
    dealt with, what you said is idiotic though.

    It is. Lomanchenko is completely unproven. You say he's so special and deride Pacquaio, yet the guy that Lomanchenko beat, Maxwell, would have been incredibly lucky to make it out of that fight with Pacquaio.

    Lomanchenko's punching isn't near as crisp as Pacquaio's, nor does have his professional experience.

    You saying he would beat Broner is not only pre-mature, it's border line insane and ******ed.

    Broner is probably the worst possible style for Lomanchenko who has fought no more than 5 professional rounds.

    If Lomanchenko gets aggressive, he gets knocked out, so do you think he can out box Broner?
     
    ROACH, Jan 13, 2013
    ROACH, Jan 13, 2013
    #3
  4. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    You brought the Pac comparison in, not me. There's more to boxing than 'crisp' punching, and I'm saying Pac is missing a lot of things from his game, that's hardly a secret.
    So far I've seen no weaknesses from Lomachenko, I can look at any fighter and see weaknesses so I know he's a once in a lifetime sort of fighter. He's got to prove himself in the pro game and he will do that, there's no reason to doubt him when he's achieved everything else he's set out to do with flying colours so far.
    Broner is also largely unproven at the pro level and wasn't a quarter of the amateur Lomachenko has been. They're the same size and age, Lomachenko is undoubtably the more skilled boxer out of the two. There are other variables that favour Broner but give Lomachenko pro experience and he will beat Broner, I guarantee it. If they fought tomorrow then yes I still favour Lomachenko, Broner isn't an aggressive guy who could pressure Lomachenko for 12 rounds. A strong, aggressive pressure fighter would beat Lomachenko in the pro game right now but he's not going to be out skilled by anyone, Broner included. Could he take Broner's punch? We don't know but there's no reason to think Lomachenko has any chin problems.
    That's my viewpoint, you want to calm down now?
     
    dealt_with, Jan 13, 2013
    dealt_with, Jan 13, 2013
    #4
  5. Brownies

    Brownies Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,776
    8
    Aug 16, 2010
    No need to start a thread because you disagreed with him in another thread. It's a sport, not rocket science, so I have no problem with a little hype.
     
    Brownies, Jan 13, 2013
    Brownies, Jan 13, 2013
    #5
  6. angry cuban

    angry cuban Huge Boxing Fan Full Member

    820
    0
    Jul 14, 2012
    Maybe he beat him right now..who knows?..ppl are hyping this dude cuz his amateur background yet there is somebody @ 130 who have better amateur background yet but you know how the hype train go crazy...in boxing when two guys with real good boxing skills meet in the ring nobody knows what will happen...
     
    angry cuban, Jan 13, 2013
    angry cuban, Jan 13, 2013
    #6
  7. PityTheFool

    PityTheFool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,192
    6
    Oct 18, 2011
    I don't agree but is it really necessary to try and humiliate a guy just because he has a somewhat controversial opinion?
    This is a bad,bad thread that makes the OP look far worse than dealt with.
    People will find the prediction laughable but was the thread necessary? Are you trying to curry favour with Floyd fans Roach?
     
    PityTheFool, Jan 13, 2013
    PityTheFool, Jan 13, 2013
    #7
  8. ROACH

    ROACH Boxing Addict banned

    3,130
    1
    Sep 27, 2012
    He called me out first. I wasn't even in attack mode.

    I don't have any issues with Broner. He doesn't have a history thus far of running his mouth and ducking fighters.
     
    ROACH, Jan 13, 2013
    ROACH, Jan 13, 2013
    #8
  9. SJS19

    SJS19 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,479
    14
    Jun 13, 2011
    Ban Ban Ban.
     
    SJS19, Jan 13, 2013
    SJS19, Jan 13, 2013
    #9
  10. boxeo#1

    boxeo#1 Boxer-Puncher banned

    8,993
    1
    May 11, 2007
    This content is protected
     
    boxeo#1, Jan 13, 2013
    boxeo#1, Jan 13, 2013
    #10
  11. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    I think I'm going to start a new thread explaining how I disagree with this thread.
     
    shaunster101, Jan 13, 2013
    shaunster101, Jan 13, 2013
    #11
  12. weegriffin

    weegriffin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,121
    22
    Aug 25, 2009
    Lomachenko probably has a better amateur record than Gamboa 2 time Olympic gold Medalist, 2 time world champion as well as joniour medals and European medals.

    1 known loss in 300 odd fights.
     
    weegriffin, Jan 13, 2013
    weegriffin, Jan 13, 2013
    #12
  13. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    Probably? :lol:
    Understatement of the year, and it's closer to 400 fights with 1 loss now :good
     
    dealt_with, Jan 13, 2013
    dealt_with, Jan 13, 2013
    #13
  14. weegriffin

    weegriffin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,121
    22
    Aug 25, 2009
    I only checked their records after I made the post I knew Lomachenko had won 2 World and 2 Olympic gold medals as well as a World silver. With Gamboa I wasn't sure how many medals he won outside of the Olympic gold medal.
     
    weegriffin, Jan 13, 2013
    weegriffin, Jan 13, 2013
    #14
  15. flashy k.o

    flashy k.o Supporter of E.E fighters Full Member

    15,275
    75
    Oct 21, 2011

    This content is protected
    :yep

    This content is protected
    !     :deal

    This content is protected
     
    flashy k.o, Jan 13, 2013
    flashy k.o, Jan 13, 2013
    #15
Page 1 of 2