Charles vs. Holman II

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Joe E, May 6, 2009.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005

    you can see that charles in this holman fight as such oustanding technical skills and ring intelligence, its just his reflexes and speed and even stamina are so shot so he he can only fight in very small spurts and has to rely on more inside fighting than hes used too.
     
  2. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    279
    Jul 22, 2004
    The thing is though as you get older you maybe able to bounce around and work at a frantic pace as you once could for a full fight for a few rounds, its once you get into the later rounds your legs feel like your treading in cement and your hands feel like your carrying a big weight in either hand
     
  3. Joe E

    Joe E Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,361
    42
    May 12, 2007
    Your welcome Minotauro.
     
  4. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    158
    Mar 4, 2009
    Charles did manage to win a split decision over Paul Andrews right after this fight although Andrews wasn't highly rated at the time. This was pretty much his last good win, Holman on the other hand went onto score wins over Oakland Billy Smith and Bob Satterfield in his next two fights.

    Good effort considering how little he had left at that point of his career.
     
  5. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    According to the Boxing Register: Charley Norkus, John Holman, and Paul Andrews were all rated in the top 10 by Ring Magazine when Ezz recorded victories over them in 1955.
     
  6. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    158
    Mar 4, 2009
    I think Andrews may have been rated as a light heavyweight. The Ring Magazine had him in the top 3 during 1954 but he fell off after losses to Maxim, Johnson, Charles and Satterfield.