Charley Burley vs Thomas Hearns WW and MW

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Kamikaze, Aug 23, 2021.


Who?

  1. The prince of longing

    22.2%
  2. The Hitman

    77.8%
  3. Draw

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Kamikaze

    Kamikaze Bye for now! banned Full Member

    4,226
    4,537
    Oct 12, 2020
    The best versions of both men at both weights. 15 rounds.
     
  2. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Hearns was near unbeatable mid 80`s and prior, at welter he would have beaten Burley, but began to slip at 160, can`t fault him for the Hagler loss and that was an amazing fight, don`t know enough about Burley but he would have stood a better chance v Tommy at 160, Hearns would have beaten him at 154 too.
     
  3. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,833
    13,126
    Oct 20, 2017
    I don't understand the poll options.
     
  4. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Longing for a title shot, longing to fight Ray Robinson.
     
  5. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,833
    13,126
    Oct 20, 2017
    Yeah, but what if you think the weight makes a difference to the outcome? How do you vote for that?