Charlie Edwards v Julio Cesar Martinez Aguilar

Agreed, they seem to have all bases covered to suit their needs, I did take my case up with them though and they pretty much straight batted away everything I said , some of their rules on boxing are pretty contradictory which I pointed out.

They insisted the bet was settled correctly , even though they settled it as a winner (I had fight not to go the distance) and then voided the bet when it was made a NC and just left me my stake, I argued that their rules also say any amendments made to a result will not be used for settling purposes, so did they settle it correctly ie pay me out OR amend the result ?

All they would say was that it was settled correctly , so I said you cant have it both ways, read your rules. Still they wouldn't budge.

I took it as high up as I could go and heard nothing back for 9 days so got back to them yesterday and got it resolved today.

 

Nice.

Gotta bring the heat to these bookies when they fail to explain their actions.

Think they took the path of least resistance by settling it a NC, as more money would have came in for Edwards and anyone who bet on him would have caused an almighty **** storm if their bet had have been ruled a loser after he got finished by an illegal blow.

 

Glad you got it sorted mate, had similar issues before and i gave up as it wasnt a lot of money. Still felt aggrieved ! Lol