A gift is a gift regardless and I think that it was a better Trout than the one who fought Canelo. Charlo looked stronger and also better than he did against J Rock. His ring generalship and the way he handles himself has been upgraded and it had nothing to do with who he was fighting. 160 is a much better weight for him and I think that he has come into himself as a fighter. I am very familiar with the way GGG and Canelo moves and performs in the ring and I think that Charlo is better. They are on notice.
Of course you do Manfred, and you're the only one on planet Earth who thinks that. Canelo vs. Charlo is a decent scrap that Canelo in all likelihood wins by late stoppage or close UD, Golovkin steamrolls Charlo and KO's him in the first 3rd of the fight. There's levels here, both power and skill and Heiland lacked the skill and Williams lacked the power, Canelo and GGG don't.
NO, you don't have a point. How much credit would you have given Charlo had Heiland been in a wheelchair?
What they lack is the skill. Other than Mayweather, Canelo has never faced a fighter with the skills and power combination of a Jermall Charlo. Jamall is a class act and we haven't seen a fighter like him in the middleweight division in quite some time. People had set the bar low and they actually forgot what a real quality fighter looks like. Now they know. My money is on Charlo to become champion and beat whoever wins between GGG and Canelo.
Yeah, I do have a point and it has nothing to do with Heiland. The skills I saw on display would have worked on GGG or Canelo. I think that both would have problems with that excellent jab, movement and punching power of Charlo. As for Heiland, he won his last eight or nine fights and if I recall, I think that he was holding some type of WBC belt. Now, him coming into the ring with an injury is his problem. That don't take away from I saw from Charlo.
Charlo is a can krusher, he needs to step up, this was a fight against a cripple, he needs to face a legit top 10 guy before the year is over.