Chepo Reynoso: “Golovkin is a donkey. He doesn’t know how to box.”

According to compubox, makes all you wrote invalid.

 

The funny thing is Canelo missed 70% of his punches, outlanded GGG by something like 4 power punches FOR THE WHOLE FIGHT and was massively out jabbed, didn't do any effective body work etc etc.

The defining difference was this: Golovkin wanted it more, he threw more and he landed more.

Canelo was relying on "lucky" judging to make him win.

 

I’m also a fan of the sport and when I score fights, I try my best to be unbiased

So suck my dicc

 

Thank you for supporting my point.

Most GGG fanatics that attempt to demonstrate why he won the fight point out that he landed more jabs than Canelo.

Lanidng more punches ia clearly not a direct scoring factor.

What are factors are clean hard punches, defense, ring generalship, and effective aggression. Using thosw four elements in scoring, its rather easy to see how Canelo won.

 

You don't know how to score fights.

 

This content is protected

Golovkin outlanded Canelo by 100 punches, after seeing the fight I felt that way and this vid supports my verdict, I just think compubox is absolute rubbish, it's some fat guy clicking buttons at random.

 

I laughed when he said that. . Golovkin definitely has a donkey like demenour about him

 

I just can't argue with someone who had Floyd/Canelo remotely close. People who hate Floyd had that fight a wipe out. If you thought Floyd/Canelo was close then there's no point in arguing with you because your mind is made. You probably had Canelo beating Lara too. That fight was closer than the Floyd fight but Lara still clearly won that fight.

 

I don't care what rorschach51 scored it. He probably gave rounds to GGG that were clearly Canelo rounds in my book. Like I said, compare my timestamp with Isal's and use that as a way to judge the round.

 

Way to just skip the 11th round debate while running full speed away like the forum weasel you are.

 

"I don't care what rorschach51 scored it. He probably gave rounds to GGG that were clearly Canelo rounds in my book. Like I said, compare my timestamp with Isal's and use that as a way to judge the round."

What was that?

Oh the little vermin got owned again lmao.

 

You went overboard insulting him about the 11th round and how he scored it and now you don’t care about that debate anymore? Perhaps because you realize you went overboard about it, just like most of your points.

 

I told him I'm willing to debate it if we're doing timestamps. Instead of "telling" people how Canelo or GGG won the round show it. Isal had the right idea. All shadow does is write a whole lot of nothing instead of just giving time stamps of every punch landed to support his argument. GGG clearly outlanded Canelo by a very good amount that round. Same goes for this fat ****** @rorschach51 if he thinks GGG won round 10 but lost 11 he literally knows nothing about boxing. Canelo did far better in round 10 than 11.

 

You like to make specific claims about others, you get called on it, you squiggle and wiggle claiming the point you are arguing about is different and then you run for the door. While you are doing that you love to type LOLs and lmaos claiming you are owning everyone. If the heat gets too much for you, you claimed you are being stalked.

It’s your calling card, we all know it ellerbe, it’s why your called the weasel.

 

Wtf are you on about? I'm willing to debate. And I never called @IsaL or @shadow111 a stalker. My insults are usually on point. Isal is just incredibly biased towards Mexican fighters. Shadow writes pointless essays that get nowhere. He thinks that if he can drown people out with volume he wins and convinces people. I actually respect @IsaL for giving timestamps and explaining why he thought Canelo won. I shut that down quick by going through his timestamps and pointing out factually shots that Canelo did not land or angles that were impossible to determine if they landed or not. I also added my own timestamps of shots that clearly landed by GGG that he missed. This is debating with facts. Not writing 1000 words of nothing.

On the other hand you definitely love to stalk and follow people around the forum. I bet your creepy ass be stalking people on FB and doing other creepy ass **** too.