Chepo Reynoso: “Golovkin is a donkey. He doesn’t know how to box.”

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Gennady, Sep 7, 2018.


  1. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,173
    15,963
    Jul 25, 2014
    @shadow111 let's also note that @rorschach51 gave GGG round 3 lmao. You think I give a **** about his opinion on round 11? Round 3 was one of Canelo's most dominant and clear rounds. There's literally no possible way to give GGG round 3.
     
  2. latineg

    latineg user of dude wipes Full Member

    22,077
    16,731
    Jun 4, 2009
    Your insults are usually on point???

    See that’s funny and not true. I agree with you about a lot of what you are saying about shadows rants, that wasn’t in debate so don’t SWITCH the point as you all too often do on this forum you weasel. Are you aware you are doing that or are you ignorant to it? Regardless, fix it, start taking responsibility for it.

    I don’t belong to any other social media other than this forum, so WRONG again. As far as stalking you, if you haven’t noticed it yet the reason I do it is because you do it to others on this forum first you hypocrite. I simply distract and block you from your agenda and you don’t like that.
     
    ellerbe likes this.
  3. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,298
    15,143
    Dec 6, 2008
    I like Canelo. He's a good boxer. His style is pretty pleasing to the eye, imo, more than Golovkin's. But Golovkin won that fight very clearly. I liked Canelo's work more, but it simply wasn't enough. This is not a case of quality over quantity either because GGG landed some decent punches too, and his overall volume throughout the rounds was too great to not make him the winner.
     
    latineg likes this.
  4. latineg

    latineg user of dude wipes Full Member

    22,077
    16,731
    Jun 4, 2009
    So round 11 is no longer your focus correct???

    You first claimed there was no possible way any sane person would give GGG round 11.

    You get called out on that and you SWITCH now to round 3?

    See why you’re called the weasel??
     
  5. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,173
    15,963
    Jul 25, 2014
    I'm just waiting for shadow to refute my argument. I've already laid out my argument on why GGG clearly won round 11 with timestamps. He hasn't attempted to argue against it. My point is him using @rorschach51 as an example to why he's right is stupid, because he also gave GGG round 3 which was a clear Canelo round.
     
  6. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,173
    15,963
    Jul 25, 2014
    this
     
  7. latineg

    latineg user of dude wipes Full Member

    22,077
    16,731
    Jun 4, 2009
    Ok let me go slow, shadows argument was he and others are not insane or being unjustly biased when scoring RD11 to GGG, did you seriously not get that?

    Why make it so hard ellerbe?

    Those were the points you kept claiming to him remember????
     
  8. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,173
    15,963
    Jul 25, 2014
    I don't care about talk. Let's go through the RD, go through time stamps and FACTs and argue the round. There's no way 11 could go to Canelo. All that other extra **** is irrelevant. Let's argue rounds or facts or I'm not getting into it. Especially not with someone like shadow who will drown me out with a 1000 word essay.
     
  9. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,173
    15,963
    Jul 25, 2014
    You right though @latineg I overreacted towards @shadow111. I just know it's a pointless debate. Debating someone who wrote a research paper on why Floyd/Canelo could have been a draw is just a waste of energy. He probably thought Canelo clearly beat Lara as well.
     
    latineg likes this.
  10. latineg

    latineg user of dude wipes Full Member

    22,077
    16,731
    Jun 4, 2009

    Isal was interested in doing that with you, did you not read that page and posts?? Why do you think I called you out on that exact point dingbat? See last night you ran from this point and tonight you are stuck in here because you realize you got caught out for being sneaky last night and today you lil weasel.

    Just admit you were naughty and let’s leave it at that. Move forwards.
     
  11. latineg

    latineg user of dude wipes Full Member

    22,077
    16,731
    Jun 4, 2009

    See there you go, baby steps.
     
  12. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,173
    15,963
    Jul 25, 2014
    Isal gave up once I corrected his timestamps. Didn't even bother to respond till shadow came so he could have back up. And when he didn't respond it was a bunch of irrelevant jibber jabber instead of going through the timestamps.
     
  13. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,554
    18,243
    Oct 7, 2006
    Compubox is rubbish, that's why its not used in even influencing the score of a fight.

    Golovkin's jabs were mostly weak, tentative, safe, measuring jabs. How can you give credit for those type of punches.

    Hard jabs thrown with intentions are different, but getting credit just for extending your arm to measure distance should be minimal.

    You know what is a scoring criteria? Clean hard punches.
     
  14. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,554
    18,243
    Oct 7, 2006
    Nobody gave up bro.. You haven't even told me why you think GGG won round 11. Surely you don't think he won based on him landing a few more pawing or measuring jabs. Do you also give GGG credit for grazing jabs? Because I will tell you, the number of punches landed isn't a scoring criteria.

    The punches that matter most are the hard clean pucnhes.
     
    latineg likes this.
  15. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,173
    15,963
    Jul 25, 2014
    GGG landed plenty of power shots. Look at my timestamps. If you refute any of them we have an argument. Look at them in slow-mo if you don't think they landed I will re-watch it. GGG just outlanded Canelo by far. Canelo was not active enough!