Cherry Picking with Freddy 2: The duck

lmao... BOB ARUM chose. Naive.

 

Anyone want to tell this moron that Floyd Mayweather ducked Tszyu at 140 and then retired rather than fight any one of Mosley, Cotto, Margarito and Paul Williams?
(even though he found time to fight Sharmba Mitchell, Carlos Baldomir, and lww Ricky Hatton at ww) :rofl


It was only years later that Floyd finally screwed up enough courage to face one single top welter, Shane, who was by that time 38 years old.


Mayweather's welterweight career has been one of duckage and disgrace, and no matter what you or any other gimp says:

Pacquiao's resume shits all over Floyd's.

deal:deal

 

This thread turned into a major fail the moment Guzman's name was mentioned.

 

lol duckage...

 

I stopped reading at "bballchump11".

 

i will try to answer all of your points.

so pacquiao fighting morales 3x, barrera and marquez was not enough and pacquiao has to fight guzman also? why wouldn't valero and guzman fight each other first?

also, if you are following the events back then, it was barrera who wished for a rematch after 4 years. barrera had given pacquiao the chance to be known and it was barerra's clout that led him to get this fight way ahead of jmm who was more deservingly at that ttime since he beat barrera in a close fight. this fight eventually led to the coming of terms of both TR and GBP that led to other inter-promotional fights like cotto vs mosley.

again, if you are aware or even following boxing back then, team morales has the option for a 2nd and a 3rd fight if they want to exercise it. team pac has none and they depend only on what team morales' decision. so morales exercised the rematch option even if they lost to raheem. it's the same case with morales' exercising his option again for a 3rd fight and pac was contactually bound to fight.

at the time pac went up to lightweight and fight diaz, campbell was already scheduled to fight joan guzman which was eventually scrapped (due to guzman unprofessionality by not making the weight).

if you watched the whole video roach said that mosley is next after the cotto fight if floyd won't come out yet. and they chose cotto thinking that they would make more money fighting him than shane. also roach said, floyd is the "easiest" fight out of the cotto, mosley and floyd himself. do you believe this roach quote?

so you think pac ducked foreman? i even heard a pac interview in tagalog that foreman's height is no problem.

 

How do you clean out the welterweight division and cherry pick all of its fighters at the same time? ***** logic? Hahaha!

 

Good for you, but I had you one better. I stopped reading at "cherry picking".

 

The logic of the *****s are really baffling... When you use the word DUCK, it means that the probable opponents have a decent chance of winning if they fight but somehow the guy on the drivers seat refuse to fight.. Thats DUCK.. Now ask yourself this question, Do you think Guzman Raheem Campbell and Foreman have a chance against Pac? .... Then *****s ask yourself this question, Does Tszyu Cotto Margarito and Pac stands a chance against Floyd? YES... But somehow your idol don't have the urge to fight these guys and you can only use one word to describe it.... QUACK QUACK.... That's right, DUCK... :hat

 

ermm pacquiao signed to fight david diaz when juan diaz was still the champ.

 

when i saw both cherrypicking and duck in the thread title, the very first thing that came to my mind was mayweather. he made his whole boxing career out of these two words.

 

Freddys the dope coach shouldve ducked camacho

 

You are a douche bag for bringing complete facts to the discussion.